Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Cardenas)(CCC)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-02-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Edmunds / Valerie Edmunds vs Misty Duke / Jill Overley5-7, 2-6
2024-01-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Edmunds / Elizabeth Edmunds vs Gloria King / Randi Cabrera7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-01-13Lost 02
L#1 DoublesValerie Edmunds / Allison Marquez vs Kati Hunyadi / Flor Tovar2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Edmunds vs Brenda Campos Chacon4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-11-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Edmunds / Elizabeth Edmunds vs Yuri Caire / Kismet Sozer3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-10-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesValerie Edmunds / Monica Ramirez vs Cha Cha Schatzman / Megan Harris0-6, 1-6
2023-10-07Lost 02
L#1 DoublesValerie Edmunds / Monica Ramirez vs Roma Fonseca / Ada Castro3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Edmunds vs Laura Soto1-6
2023-09-30Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStacy Mayo / Allison Marquez vs Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker / Loretta Pineda3-6, 4-6
2023-09-25vs GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Ahmann)(EPCC#1)Split 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Edmunds / Valerie Edmunds vs Kathryn Inzer / Ana Laura Chavez A6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAllison Marquez / Stacy Mayo vs Lizbeth Ozaeta / Georgina Garcia6-0, 6-1
2023-09-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesValerie Edmunds / Patricia Contreras-Enloe vs Sylvia Duncan / Danielle Adams0-6, 1-6
2023-09-11Split 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Edmunds / Valerie Edmunds vs Maryanne Ortiz / Brettney Dee Wilcox5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Marquez / Stacy Mayo vs Angelica Alarcon / Sylvia Vega7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-29Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCaroline Mason / Valerie Edmunds vs Mercedalia Mayorga / Diane Lunghi0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Arreola/40&over/3.0W71301025266
2GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Baeza)(EPCC#2)71281231288
3GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(DaCosta)(EPTC#1)53231738325
4GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Jabor)(EPCC#1)53192146339
5GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Boss)(EPTC#2)35211945369
6GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Cardenas)(CCC)35172348348
7GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Alarcon)(TW)26152554399
8GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Lechuga)(FB)26132758392
9GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#3)26122858377

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Carla Canales
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
Allison Marquez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.39
Carmen Cardenas
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.22
Christina Mijares
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Edmunds
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Laura Houston
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Monica Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Patricia Contreras-Enloe
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Regina Porras
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
Sara Acevedo
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Shelley Danforth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Stacy Mayo
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Valerie Edmunds
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Edmunds + Allison Marquez7651% games−4.2% vs expected
Shelley Danforth + Laura Houston7751% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Danforth + Stacy Mayo5547% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Mayo + Regina Porras2845% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Cardenas + Stacy Mayo0925% gamesnot enough data
Sara Acevedo + Stacy Mayo3542% gamesnot enough data
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz + Patricia Contreras-Enloe3547% gamesnot enough data
Sara Acevedo + Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz3448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carla Canales
49W–56L career · 23 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.88
3
Allison Marquez
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Carmen Cardenas
32W–115L career · type A · 27 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.39
2.5
Christina Mijares
11W–25L career · 10 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
Elizabeth Edmunds
1W–22L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Houston
49W–21L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
18W–68L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Ramirez
16W–60L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Contreras-Enloe
4W–19L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Regina Porras
20W–44L career · 20 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara Acevedo
18W–57L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelley Danforth
21W–34L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacy Mayo
47W–94L career · 30 lines in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Edmunds
9W–30L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.