Teams

NETC: New England TC:Ghosh

2023 EMA Tri Level · 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-12-14vs PAX:Paxton:AndrianopoulosWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnees Ghosh / Yogesh Kulkarni vs Andrew Andrianopoulos / Steven Anderson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-12-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnees Ghosh / Yogesh Kulkarni vs Steven Anderson / John Dyer4-6, 3-6
2023-11-27vs PAX:Paxton:AndrianopoulosLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnees Ghosh / Yogesh Kulkarni vs Andrew Andrianopoulos / Ethan Brown3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-11-25vs PAX:Paxton:AndrianopoulosLost 01
L#1 DoublesKshitij Kathuria / Janardhan Sampath vs John Dyer / Ethan Brown0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PAX:Paxton:Andrianopoulos3131328
2WEY:Weymouth:Anderson3232434
3KIG:Kingsbury:Martin2222431
4WEY:Weymouth:Gotta2323854
5NETC: New England TC:Ghosh1313746

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Anees Ghosh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Janardhan Sampath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Yogesh Kulkarni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kshitij Kathuria
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anees Ghosh + Yogesh Kulkarni2445% games−4.0% vs expected
Anees Ghosh + Kshitij Kathuria3548% gamesnot enough data
Anees Ghosh + Janardhan Sampath4350% gamesnot enough data
Kshitij Kathuria + Yogesh Kulkarni5158% gamesnot enough data
Kshitij Kathuria + Janardhan Sampath1437% gamesnot enough data
Janardhan Sampath + Yogesh Kulkarni3250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anees Ghosh
40W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Janardhan Sampath
48W–40L career · 1 line in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
Yogesh Kulkarni
40W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Kshitij Kathuria
55W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.