Teams

WEY:Weymouth:Gotta

2023 EMA Tri Level · 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-29vs KIG:Kingsbury:MartinWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Boyd / Dan Condon vs Mike Gallant / Rich Whelpley0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-10-22vs WEY:Weymouth:AndersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Kleiman / Bruce Riddick vs Richard Anderson / David Cipoletta1-6, 2-6
2023-10-22vs WEY:Weymouth:AndersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesDan Condon / Richard Kleiman vs Derrek Owen / David Cipoletta2-6, 5-7
2023-10-15vs KIG:Kingsbury:MartinLost 01
L#1 DoublesDan Condon / Brian Gotta vs Michael Carney / Mike Gallant2-6, 5-7
2023-10-02vs WEY:Weymouth:AndersonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Boyd / Bruce Riddick vs David Cipoletta / David Comis3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PAX:Paxton:Andrianopoulos3131328
2WEY:Weymouth:Anderson3232434
3KIG:Kingsbury:Martin2222431
4WEY:Weymouth:Gotta2323854
5NETC: New England TC:Ghosh1313746

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
James Boyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bruce Riddick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Brian Gotta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Dan Condon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Richard Kleiman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alejandro Mendoza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Gotta + James Boyd3352% games−0.4% vs expected
James Boyd + Bruce Riddick3546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
James Boyd
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Bruce Riddick
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Brian Gotta
17W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Dan Condon
15W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Richard Kleiman
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
2.87
Alejandro Mendoza
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.