Teams

Oakey's

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 8.0 - 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-09vs Montana/Green/55 & Over-8.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatti Oakes / Anna Bishop vs Mary Ellen Stewart / Doris Puglisi1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJan DeCosse / Amy Gallik vs Susan Ward / Miho Lloyd3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Nelson / Nancy Unglaub vs Adrienne Dube / Stacie Wunsch7-6, 7-6
2025-08-09vs Montana/Green/55 & Over-8.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnnette Christie / Anna Bishop vs Gatchina Hessler / Mary Ellen Stewart6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNancy Unglaub / Kathy Nelson vs Caroline Bennett / Adrienne Dube4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Bark / Nancy Barber vs Colleen Green / Jean Clary0-6, 2-6
2025-08-08vs Montana/Green/55 & Over-8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesKandy Chain / Patti Oakes vs Caroline Bennett / Doris Puglisi4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Gallik / Jan DeCosse vs Susan Ward / Miho Lloyd4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShelley Williams / Katie Bark vs Stacie Wunsch / Adrienne Dube3-6, 2-6
2025-08-08vs Montana/Green/55 & Over-8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Unglaub / Annette Christie vs Caroline Bennett / Doris Puglisi2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Nelson / Shelley Williams vs Gatchina Hessler / Mary Ellen Stewart3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Barber / Anna Bishop vs Jean Clary / Colleen Green4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 - 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Anna Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Amy Gallik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Annette Christie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Shelley Williams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Nancy Unglaub
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
2.88
Patti Oakes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jan DeCosse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Nelson
published
Katie Bark
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Barber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Bishop + Nancy Unglaub5456% games−4.9% vs expected
Shelley Williams + Katie Bark5253% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Barber + Katie Bark3259% gamesnot enough data
Jan DeCosse + Nancy Unglaub5069% gamesnot enough data
Patti Oakes + Katie Bark134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Bishop
110W–112L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Amy Gallik
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Annette Christie
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Shelley Williams
7W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Nancy Unglaub
120W–91L career · 3 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Patti Oakes
79W–191L career · 2 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Jan DeCosse
28W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Nelson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Bark
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Barber
40W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.