Teams

Luke/18/2.5/WD/THOM

2025 LAF Adult 18 & Over - Women Day · 2.5 LAF (18&O) Women Day

4 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-03vs Gabal/18/2.5/WD/THOMLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Daigle / Tiffany Carter vs Aimee Billeaud / April Ledet2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLizzie Herter vs Lenisse Robertson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRachelle Lanclos / Lacie Luke vs Gabrielle Boudreaux / Kimberly Fontenot3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-27vs Jordan/18/2.5/WD/THOMLost 03
L#1 DoublesTiffany Carter / Rachelle Lanclos vs Brittany Landry / Angelle Dueitt1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Daigle vs Emily Jordan5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLizzie Herter / Lacie Luke vs Jordan Dugas / Lauren LaBauve2-6, 3-6
2025-03-20vs Abdalla/18/2.5/WD/THOMLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachelle Lanclos / Jennifer Daigle vs Stephanie Abdalla / Lacie Jo Lafleur4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLacie Luke vs Katie Viator2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLizzie Herter / Tiffany Carter vs Shireen Cade / Kerrie Bourque6-1, 6-1
2025-03-13vs Chambers/18/2.5/WD/ThomLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Daigle / Lizzie Herter vs Bobbie Chambers / Laura Fremin0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRachelle Lanclos vs Shannon Hargrave5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLacie Luke / Tiffany Carter vs Priscilla Spain / Melanie Hoffpauir1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5 LAF (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chambers/18/2.5/WD/Thom40111463
2Jordan/18/2.5/WD/THOM3193766
3Gabal/18/2.5/WD/THOM224816110
4Abdalla/18/2.5/WD/THOM134818122
5Luke/18/2.5/WD/THOM0421021136

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.79 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

1.79
Lacie Luke
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Jennifer Daigle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Lizzie Herter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Rachelle Lanclos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lacie Luke
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.79
Jennifer Daigle
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lizzie Herter
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachelle Lanclos
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.