Teams

Jordan/18/2.5/WD/THOM

2025 LAF Adult 18 & Over - Women Day · 2.5 LAF (18&O) Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-10vs Abdalla/18/2.5/WD/THOMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJordan Dugas / Lauren LaBauve vs Stephanie Abdalla / Lacie Jo Lafleur6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKalin Marino / Victoria Cobo vs Kerrie Bourque / Katie Viator4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-04-03vs Chambers/18/2.5/WD/ThomLost 12
W#1 DoublesAngelle Dueitt / Renee Ezell vs Priscilla Spain / Shannon Hargrave4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKalin Marino vs Logan Dupre3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Bourque / Kristi Guillotte vs Amanda Boyer / Kathryn Guidry7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-27vs Luke/18/2.5/WD/THOMWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrittany Landry / Angelle Dueitt vs Tiffany Carter / Rachelle Lanclos6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Jordan vs Jennifer Daigle7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJordan Dugas / Lauren LaBauve vs Lizzie Herter / Lacie Luke6-2, 6-3
2025-03-20vs Gabal/18/2.5/WD/THOMWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrittany Landry / Kristi Guillotte vs Jillian Gabal / Jamie Veverica6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Bourque vs April Ledet6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Jordan / Victoria Cobo vs Aimee Billeaud / Lyndley McNabb7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 LAF (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Angelle Dueitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.67
Emily Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.59
Renee Ezell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Victoria Cobo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Bourque
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Jordan Dugas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kalin Marino
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kristi Guillotte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lauren LaBauve
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Ezell + Angelle Dueitt404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Angelle Dueitt
9W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.79
Emily Jordan
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
Renee Ezell
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Victoria Cobo
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.42
Jennifer Bourque
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jordan Dugas
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kalin Marino
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristi Guillotte
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren LaBauve
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.