Teams

Q Team

2022 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-07-31vs Montana/Bach/40&Over8.0MXLost 12
W#1 DoublesPaige Darden / Chris Montague vs Chuck Smith / Danielle Smith6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Ritchie / Ned Tranel vs Raymond Armstrong / Jennifer Nielson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohncarl Rogge / Nancy Kastner vs Amber Sparks / David Dernbach1-6, 1-6
2022-07-30vs Montana/Bach/40&Over8.0MXLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohncarl Rogge / Nancy Kastner vs Amber Sparks / David Dernbach0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMark Johns / Sarah Bach vs Paige Darden / Chris Montague6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnn Jackson / Ned Tranel vs Chuck Smith / Danielle Smith2-6, 6-7
2022-07-29vs Montana/Bach/40&Over8.0MXLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohncarl Rogge / Nancy Kastner vs Amber Sparks / David Dernbach3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Darden / Chris Montague vs Mark Johns / Jennifer Nielson3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRaymond Armstrong / Sarah Bach vs Mary Ritchie / Ned Tranel1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Johncarl Rogge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Mary Ritchie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.89
Sarah Bach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ann Jackson
published 3.5
Chris Montague
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Nancy Kastner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ned Tranel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paige Darden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Johncarl Rogge + Mary Ritchie123 matchesnot enough data
Johncarl Rogge + Nancy Kastner033 matchesnot enough data
Johncarl Rogge + Sarah Bach303 matchesnot enough data
Ned Tranel + Sarah Bach303 matchesnot enough data
Chris Montague + Paige Darden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Johncarl Rogge
36W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Mary Ritchie
37W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
4.19
4
Sarah Bach
59W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
3.5
Ann Jackson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Chris Montague
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Kastner
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ned Tranel
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paige Darden
23W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.