Teams

An.Willard40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-25vs Cr.Smith40ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaggie LaPlante / Maggie Patterson vs Kimberly Monsees / Meghan Yancey0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSusanne Knowles vs Jolyne Taylor7-6, 7-5
2024-04-11vs Ki.Johnson40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaggie Patterson / Maggie LaPlante vs Diane Sauer / Tobi Buckley6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSusanne Knowles vs Michele Fitzsimons3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-04vs Ma.Schantz40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesAmanda Bauer / Susanne Knowles vs Sarah Breazeale / Jennifer McCown7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaggie LaPlante vs Noelle Jackson0-6, 2-6
2024-03-21vs Ch.Jenkins40ALost 01
L#2 DoublesSusanne Knowles / Suzanne Wagner vs Jennifer Holloman / Shannon Phillips6-7, 2-6
2024-03-14vs Ta.LeFevre40ALost 01
L#1 SinglesMaggie LaPlante vs Christine Subasic6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2024-03-13vs Pa.Cochran40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaggie LaPlante / Maggie Patterson vs Wendy Hanshew / Kellie Snider6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Maggie Patterson
published
3.34
Maggie LaPlante
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
3.32
Amanda Bauer
published 3.5
3.25
Suzanne Wagner
published
3.22
Susanne Knowles
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Ann Willard
published 3.5
3.13
Lynn Trefzger
published
3.02
Maureen Nixon
published 3.5
2.96
Toni Paladino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susanne Knowles + Maggie LaPlante8950% games+0.1% vs expected
Ann Willard + Suzanne Wagner224 matchesnot enough data
Susanne Knowles + Amanda Bauer123 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Wagner + Mary Margaret Patton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Patterson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Maggie LaPlante
95W–120L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Mary Margaret Patton
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Amanda Bauer
13W–23L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Suzanne Wagner
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Susanne Knowles
94W–122L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Ann Willard
10W–20L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Lynn Trefzger
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Maureen Nixon
77W–85L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Annette Tavernaro
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
Toni Paladino
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.