Teams

LAC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-11vs LTA-Q ORANGEWon 21
L#1 SinglesMichelle Pulley vs Lynn Schulte5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPaula Nelsen / Elizabeth Korniczky vs Charlotte Marsh / Amanda Billow6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Mcreynolds / Kim Kadlic vs Julie Stockert / Michelle Snyder6-1, 7-5
2023-07-05vs MEA TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Korniczky / Paula Nelsen vs Ande Bernthal / Katherine Spines6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Payne / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Heather Middleton / Sara Oclassen6-2, 6-2
2023-06-27vs BRMST BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Kadlic / Lydia Wuensch vs Jane Davis / Yayoi Shaw6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Payne / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Michelle Schulz / Erin Kintzle6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaula Nelsen / Michelle Pulley vs Jacy Bowers / Kathy Schmidt3-6, 4-6
2023-06-20vs LTA-Q ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Mcreynolds / Christina Cope vs Lynn Schulte / Hilary Hartwig3-6, 3-5
W#3 DoublesLydia Wuensch / Kim Kadlic vs Sonja Gifford / Logan Newens6-3, 6-2
2023-06-13vs MEA TEALWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Korniczky / Paula Nelsen vs Nikki Boye / Nancy Travis6-1, 6-1
2023-06-06vs BRMST BLUEWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristina Cope / Lydia Wuensch vs Noelle Anthony / Laura Tedesco7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaula Nelsen / Elizabeth Korniczky vs Kathy Schmidt / Debra Masters6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Kelly Mcreynolds
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Christina Cope
published 4
3.74
Elizabeth Korniczky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Kim Kadlic
published
3.71
Mona Jones
published
3.68
Paula Nelsen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Lydia Wuensch
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Robin Galloway
published
3.59
Michelle Pulley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Nelsen + Elizabeth Korniczky15758% games+1.3% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Lydia Wuensch4448% games−2.2% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Kelly Mcreynolds7362% games−5.1% vs expected
Kelly Mcreynolds + Lydia Wuensch8953% games−9.0% vs expected
Lydia Wuensch + Kim Kadlic2343% games−11.7% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Michelle Pulley6447% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Mcreynolds + Michelle Pulley8163% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Mcreynolds + Elizabeth Korniczky404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Mcreynolds
127W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Christina Cope
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Korniczky
59W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Kim Kadlic
45W–33L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Mona Jones
20W–24L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Paula Nelsen
85W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Lydia Wuensch
65W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.63
Robin Galloway
11W–28L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Michelle Pulley
38W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.