Teams

LTA-Q ORANGE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-11vs LAC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCatherine Romero / Justine Barone vs Robin Galloway / Lisa Christie6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Marsh / Amanda Billow vs Paula Nelsen / Elizabeth Korniczky1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-07-08vs BRMST BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesJustine Barone / Amanda Billow vs Stacey Mari / Michelle Schulz6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-27vs MEA TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustine Barone / Catherine Romero vs Ania Brakhage / Hilary Wallace6-0, 6-4
2023-06-20vs LAC REDLost 02
L#1 SinglesJustine Barone vs Mona Jones7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Romero / Julie Stockert vs Robin Galloway / Lisa Christie5-7, 4-6
2023-06-13vs BRMST BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda Billow / Justine Barone vs Jane Davis / Yayoi Shaw5-7, 6-7
2023-06-06vs MEA TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Romero / Amanda Billow vs Hilary Wallace / Heather Middleton3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Lynn Schulte
published
4.01
Hilary Hartwig
published 4
3.75
Justine Barone
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.61
Catherine Romero
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.30
Amanda Billow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Michelle Snyder
published
3.15
Jency Paul
published
3.14
Julie Stockert
published
3.10
Charlotte Marsh
published 3.5
Logan Newens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Snyder + Julie Stockert7357% games+6.5% vs expected
Charlotte Marsh + Julie Stockert3743% games−3.3% vs expected
Catherine Romero + Hilary Hartwig121050% games−4.5% vs expected
Amanda Billow + Catherine Romero4454% gamesnot enough data
Justine Barone + Catherine Romero224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Snyder + Charlotte Marsh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Schulte
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
4.14
4
Hilary Hartwig
91W–56L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Justine Barone
91W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Catherine Romero
86W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Amanda Billow
69W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Michelle Snyder
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Jency Paul
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Julie Stockert
11W–24L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Charlotte Marsh
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Logan Newens
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.