Teams

TAG SILVER

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

14 players · average NTRP 3.54 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs FCCC PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoy Miller / Bethany Seely vs June Ellen Feil / Jennifer Camp6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Crespin / Larea Warden vs Kristine Clagett / Lisa Clay6-2, 6-3
2021-07-21vs LVTA ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Novacek / Amber Slade vs Heidi Abrahamson / Heather Huntley2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanice Mossberg / Bethany Seely vs Gina Solanyk / Jeannine MacHon6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNikki Ellis / Anne Moyer vs Connie Erickson / Joyce Depagnier6-1, 7-6
2021-07-15vs MLF BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesJoy Miller / Bethany Seely vs Corey Green / Tracey Stefanon6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNikki Ellis / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik vs Karen Kiser / Jaime Donnelly4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmber Slade / Marcia Stauter vs Camy Davis / Tracey Foundoulis5-7, 2-6
2021-07-08vs HMTC YELLOWWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Novacek / Janice Mossberg vs Jill Braddock / Jodi Koronich6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichelle Sheets / Janet Crespin vs Kathy Lynch / Vicki Dean6-2, 6-1
2021-07-07vs CSU GOLDLost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Novacek / Janice Mossberg vs Celeste Blackburn / Brenda Stewart3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNikki Ellis vs Alicia Armentrout6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJanet Crespin / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik vs Kim Jensen / Sara Mullarkey4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Sheets / Marcia Stauter vs Camille Benton / Rachel White3-6, 1-6
2021-06-17vs FCCC PINKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanet Crespin / Larea Warden vs Kristine Clagett / Karen Dunbar6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNikki Ellis / Marcia Stauter vs Lisa Clay / Jane Gronewoller0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-06-10vs MLF BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanice Mossberg / Bethany Seely vs Melissa Seager / Samantha Gallegos4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Novacek / Amber Slade vs Marni Crowell / Jaime Donnelly6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichelle Sheets / Nikki Ellis vs Tracey Foundoulis / Shannon Ellis2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Bethany Seely
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Cathy Graves
published 4
3.64
Joy Miller
published
3.60
Alexandra DeBever
published 3.5
3.46
Janet Crespin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Lisa Novacek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Anne Moyer
published 3.5
3.25
Larea Warden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Amber Slade
published 3.5
3.13
Janice Mossberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Michelle Sheets
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Nikki Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.92
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.67
Marcia Stauter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Miller + Bethany Seely7169% games+13.9% vs expected
Michelle Sheets + Janet Crespin7556% games+7.2% vs expected
Joy Miller + Janice Mossberg5072% games+6.4% vs expected
Lisa Novacek + Amber Slade10454% games+5.8% vs expected
Nikki Ellis + Amber Slade2347% games+3.1% vs expected
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik + Amber Slade8655% games+2.8% vs expected
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik + Janet Crespin6654% games+1.8% vs expected
Lisa Novacek + Janice Mossberg181057% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bethany Seely
76W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Cathy Graves
14W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Joy Miller
33W–16L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Alexandra DeBever
31W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%21%79%
3.60
3.5
Janet Crespin
130W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Lisa Novacek
105W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Anne Moyer
12W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Larea Warden
110W–61L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Amber Slade
46W–43L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Janice Mossberg
121W–94L career · 4 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Michelle Sheets
67W–96L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Nikki Ellis
30W–58L career · 5 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik
63W–79L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Marcia Stauter
93W–81L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.