Teams

Longwood-Finlay

2022 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · 4.0 women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Sheri de Haan
published
3.89
Karen Bart
published
3.58
Sharon Ross
published
3.54
Jan Pearce
published
3.53
Danielle Allenbach
published 3.5
3.43
Rena Millwood
published
3.42
Amy Pope
published 3.5
3.39
Paula Hoffman
published
3.35
Lois Finlay
published
3.33
Jana Mastrogiovanni
published
Amber Carter
published 3.5
3.22
Pamela Jackson
published
Lori Burke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lois Finlay + Lori Burke3350% gamesnot enough data
Paula Hoffman + Rena Millwood123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheri de Haan
79W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
Karen Bart
61W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
Sharon Ross
8W–29L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Jan Pearce
46W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Danielle Allenbach
41W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.53
Rena Millwood
9W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
3.5
Amy Pope
19W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Paula Hoffman
10W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Lois Finlay
11W–18L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.35
Jana Mastrogiovanni
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.33
3.5
Amber Carter
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Jackson
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.22
Lori Burke
13W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.