Teams

Team 2 Superior Court

2021 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-04-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesArchella Dorsey / Paula Grenier vs Michelle Schneider / Debby Horlacher4-6, 2-3
2021-04-18vs Team 3 RJ Hot SeatsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Farabow / Janice Zima vs Joan-Marie Turchiano / Stephanie Bozarth5-7, 6-5
W#2 DoublesArchella Dorsey / Michelle Parris vs Paula Cotman / Stephanie Fliakas1-1
2021-04-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesArchella Dorsey vs Elizabeth Lucchesi0-6, 1-6
2021-04-05vs Team 5 Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaula Grenier / Janice Zima vs Mindi Moshides / Tina Woods3-6, 2-6
2021-04-02vs Team 11 Supernovas.Lost 01
L#1 DoublesArchella Dorsey / Janice Zima vs Michelle Grande / Karen Sullivan7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2021-03-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShelly Briscoe / Janice Zima vs Moira Buzby / Luanne Griffin3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-03-14vs Team 3 RJ Hot SeatsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Potter / Janice Zima vs Stephanie Bozarth / Mary Berkowitz0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesArchella Dorsey vs Maria Costea0-6
2021-03-07vs Team 4Won 10
W#1 DoublesJanice Zima / Page Coleman vs Lynne Aoyama / Ann Shankroff6-1, 6-0
2021-03-06vs Team 3 RJ Hot SeatsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Farabow / Archella Dorsey vs Pamela Martin / Stephanie Bozarth6-4, 2-1
2021-02-28vs Team 8 in2WIN...we refuse to loseSplit 11
L#1 DoublesArchella Dorsey / Diana Shevlin vs Amanda Smith / Joan Kissal6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanice Zima / Amy Cahoon vs Alexandra Davis / Denise Warburton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-02-25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesArchella Dorsey vs Allison Erdle2-6, 2-5
2021-02-21vs Team 14 Slice GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Potter / Janice Zima vs Susan Wade / Tara Rethore1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Page Coleman
published
3.05
Jennifer Graham
published
2.85
Janice Zima
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.82
Archella Dorsey
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.53
Kathy Potter
published
Shelly Briscoe
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Page Coleman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Jennifer Graham
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Janice Zima
231W–194L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Archella Dorsey
114W–147L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
Kathy Potter
15W–45L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
2.53
Shelly Briscoe
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.