Teams

Team 5 Sassy Smashers

2021 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-04-26vs Team 4Won 20
W#1 DoublesMindi Moshides / Elizabeth Clarke vs Carrie Fleming / Sarah Shin7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura McNicholl / Kate Trask vs Lynne Aoyama / Karen Boulineaux7-6, 3-2
2021-04-05vs Team 2 Superior CourtSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMindi Moshides / Tina Woods vs Paula Grenier / Janice Zima6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Clarke / Kate Trask vs Shelly Briscoe / Silvia Gulino1-6, 5-4
2021-03-21vs Team 3 RJ Hot SeatsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMindi Moshides / Niki Friedman vs Stephanie Peebles / Denise Weinig3-6, 3-6
2021-03-14vs Team 11 Supernovas.Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMindi Moshides / Laura McNicholl vs Michelle Grande / Patti Sinnen2-6, 1-6
2021-03-05vs Team 1 Tamara's Slice GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Malloy / Laura McNicholl vs Hope Wolf / Ana Rivas Beck6-2, 2-5
2021-02-21vs Team 10Split 11
W#1 DoublesAndrea Davis / Kate Trask vs Laura Lapin / Andrea Myslicki6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Malloy / Laura McNicholl vs Ellen House / Michelle Schneider5-7, 1-4
2021-02-14vs Team 7 Spin DoctorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Davis / Kate Trask vs Cynthia Grubbs / Joanne Swain7-6, 3-4
2021-02-04vs Team 6Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMindi Moshides / Niki Friedman vs Stephanie Fultz / Jamie Mellon3-6, 5-3
L#2 DoublesKate Trask / Kim McCool vs Kim Dwyer / Stacey Wierzba2-6, 2-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Josephine Cooper
published
3.18
Elizabeth Clarke
published 3.5
3.16
Mindi Moshides
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
Niki Friedman
published
2.70
Kim McCool
published
2.69
Laura McNicholl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Kate Trask
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Lisa Cacciatore
published
Tina Woods
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura McNicholl + Kate Trask171945% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josephine Cooper
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Elizabeth Clarke
6W–22L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Mindi Moshides
105W–104L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.16
Niki Friedman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
2.90
Kim McCool
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Laura McNicholl
92W–115L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Kate Trask
121W–137L career · 5 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59
Lisa Cacciatore
8W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tina Woods
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.