Teams

Maximum Tennis

2023 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.0 Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-18vs Sportime HI- Armada UnitedWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Sullivan / Susan O'Brien vs Jennifer Barney / Janice Loll3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Milano Buckley vs LINDSAY NAZE / Sharmeen Dossani6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Byrne / Mary Mooney vs Megan Brausa / Chiara Saccomano6-1, 7-6
2022-11-09vs TCH: Aces-on-HudsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Milano Buckley vs Jennie Mooney / Karen Healy2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Byrne / Mary Mooney vs Suzanne Page / Wendi Black Strier6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLoretta Lifrieri / Marianne Bateman vs Sandra de Novellis / Janice Shepps4-6, 1-6
2022-11-04vs Westchester Country ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sullivan / Susan O'Brien vs Caitlin Moffett / Lauren Julian6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTracy McCarthy / Veronika Roberts vs Clare Mulcahy / Danielle Martell6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori de la Guardia / Laila Worrell vs Kathleen Long / Marcia McCabe6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-21vs Sportime Lake IsleWon 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Milano Buckley vs Faith Dallal / Tanya Meyers3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBirgit Landgrebe / Mary Mooney vs Lisa Ferree / Emelie Preis6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori de la Guardia / Nancy Hubert vs Laurie Medvinsky / Kay-Lin Richardson6-2, 6-4
2022-10-11vs TCH: Queens of the CourtWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sullivan / Milano Buckley vs Lisa Schneider / Sarah Miller6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBirgit Landgrebe / Mary Mooney vs Lisa Schein / Marci Ponagai6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLoretta Lifrieri / Veronika Roberts vs Simone Bindela / Stephanie Balkin3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sullivan / Susan O'Brien vs Susan Barnes-Girling / Nao Wynne4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Mooney / Elizabeth Byrne vs Brooke Brandt / Stephanie Secchia6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaila Worrell / Lori de la Guardia vs Linda Fang / Michele Gowda7-5, 6-0
2022-09-20vs WTC: Double ShotsWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan O'Brien / Jennifer Sullivan vs Lj Dinovo / Marli Meier7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Byrne / Mary Mooney vs Nicole Dashiell / Krysta Holland6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesVeronika Roberts / Milano Buckley vs Dyana Sumner / Andrea Tait6-4, 7-6
2022-09-14vs Life Time SapphireLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Milano Buckley vs Jennifer Hoffmann / Kate Plemich2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Byrne / Veronika Roberts vs Henriette Boehmert-Leske / Elizabeth Parks7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLoretta Lifrieri / Marianne Bateman vs Tulika Khemani / Jennifer Bancroft0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 3.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chestnut Ridge: Ace Kickers0819511152
2Rye Racquet Love is Nothing0818612160
3WTC Hot Shots0817613161
4Life Time Sapphire0818514154
5Armonk Tennis Club: Whippoorwill0817716164
6TIA GRINDERS 3.00816819199
7Sportime HI- Armada United0816819185
8Saw Mill Fireballs0812922198
9Maximum Tennis0816822194
10Rye Racquet Club: Dare Doubles0815922189
11Sportime HI- Hits & Giggles0817722190
12TCH: Aces-on-Hudson08131023195
13WCC Grand Slams0814924197
14Yonkers Tennis: IGC08131025211
15Sportime LI: Forever Ins08121125213
16Armonk Indoor: Serves You Right08111328216
17Sportime Lake Isle: Topspin Tigers08121228222
18Armonk Tennis: Ace in the Hole08101329249
19Rye Racquet Club: Overserved08111229223
20WTC: Double Shots08121231233
21Club Fit JV Aces0891231235
22Club Fit Briarcliff Dare Doubles08101432241
23New Rochelle Racquet Club: Harley Queens0881533235
24Sportime HI: Flint Park Village People0881534256
25Yonkers Tennis Center0851937251
26Hardscrabble Tempest0861838260
27Match Point Rockland Raquettes0861838250
28WTC: Slice Girls0841839260
29TCH: Queens of the Court0851939254
30Grand Slam Overserved0851940259

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Elizabeth Byrne
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.06
Lori de la Guardia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Milano Buckley
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.02
Catherine Chatham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Laila Worrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Birgit Landgrebe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Jennifer Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Susan O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Loretta Lifrieri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Deborah Briscoe
published 2.5
2.03
Barbara Corini
published 2.5
Marianne Bateman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 0
Nancy Hubert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tracy McCarthy
published
Veronika Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Sullivan + Milano Buckley10264% games+16.0% vs expected
Susan O'Brien + Elizabeth Byrne4262% games+11.4% vs expected
Jennifer Sullivan + Catherine Chatham3253% games+4.1% vs expected
Catherine Chatham + Milano Buckley17658% games+3.6% vs expected
Susan O'Brien + Jennifer Sullivan201054% games+1.6% vs expected
Mary Mooney + Elizabeth Byrne4157% games+1.4% vs expected
Birgit Landgrebe + Mary Mooney14852% games+1.4% vs expected
Veronika Roberts + Catherine Chatham2649% games+1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Byrne
26W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Lori de la Guardia
57W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Milano Buckley
49W–27L career · 9 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Catherine Chatham
137W–102L career · 4 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Laila Worrell
37W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Birgit Landgrebe
72W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Jennifer Sullivan
67W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Susan O'Brien
50W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Loretta Lifrieri
26W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Deborah Briscoe
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Barbara Corini
15W–34L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Marianne Bateman
5W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
0
Mary Mooney
43W–61L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Hubert
18W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Tracy McCarthy
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Veronika Roberts
24W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.