Teams

Sportime HI- Hits & Giggles

2023 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.0 Day

19 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-13vs Match Point Rockland RaquettesWon 20
W#1 DoublesAudrey Smith / Sandy Kim vs Malki Gartenberg / Mindy Rotberg6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElana Minkove / Lindsey Anderson vs Naomi Schlesinger / Tammy Grossberger6-2, 6-2
2022-12-08vs Yonkers Tennis: IGCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAudrey Smith / Jennifer Naso vs Alicia Cintron / Patricia Coomaraswamy4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsey Anderson / Katie Benedict vs Dawn Jackson / Melissa Chepuru6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSarah Raeben / Miriam Morrow vs Daniela Sansone / Pamela Montgomery2-6, 0-6
2022-12-02vs Sportime Harbor IslandWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Benedict / Sarah Raeben vs Andrea Kischkat / Cynthia Goodstein3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElana Minkove / Athena Maikish vs Elizabeth Bernstein / Amy Kline1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Lee / Robyn Rosenberg vs Jessy Choi / Carol Holtby6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-11-15vs Old OaksWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Kim / Elana Minkove vs Dina Cohen / Nancy Blaine6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKerry Roberts / Athena Maikish vs Lisa Kantor / Tatiana Zamarron Villalba1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRobyn Rosenberg / Patrice Fitzpatrick vs Dana Wiczyk / Chelsea Fraenkel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-11-08vs Rye Racquet Love is NothingLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlison Bonaviso / Jennifer Naso vs Ellen Saya / Kristen Hoft6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKerry Roberts / Elana Minkove vs Michelle Jung / Kate Stempel3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Mathieson / Kayleigh Vogel vs Andrea Walker / Doreen Gilligan1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJennifer Naso / Veronica Barnes vs Karen Bray / Adrienne Sommerville-Kiamie6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAthena Maikish / Kerry Roberts vs Monica Mullan / Lisa Horten6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobyn Rosenberg / Patrice Fitzpatrick vs Eileen Miller / Donna Henry1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-30vs WCC Grand SlamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlison Bonaviso / Jennifer Naso vs Rebecca le Neve Foster / Therese Karl7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobyn Rosenberg / Sarah Raeben vs Staci Ramachandran / Jacklyn Lim6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAthena Maikish / Karen Lee vs Jennifer Khan / Alison Heaton6-2, 6-2
2022-09-20vs WTC: Slice GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlison Bonaviso / Sandy Kim vs Sharon Mantel / Katie Walbridge2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAthena Maikish / Elana Minkove vs Gwynn Hurshman / Caroline Houghton6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Benedict / Sarah Raeben vs Randi Menchel / Lauren Cherny6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 3.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chestnut Ridge: Ace Kickers0819511152
2Rye Racquet Love is Nothing0818612160
3WTC Hot Shots0817613161
4Life Time Sapphire0818514154
5Armonk Tennis Club: Whippoorwill0817716164
6TIA GRINDERS 3.00816819199
7Sportime HI- Armada United0816819185
8Saw Mill Fireballs0812922198
9Maximum Tennis0816822194
10Rye Racquet Club: Dare Doubles0815922189
11Sportime HI- Hits & Giggles0817722190
12TCH: Aces-on-Hudson08131023195
13WCC Grand Slams0814924197
14Yonkers Tennis: IGC08131025211
15Sportime LI: Forever Ins08121125213
16Armonk Indoor: Serves You Right08111328216
17Sportime Lake Isle: Topspin Tigers08121228222
18Armonk Tennis: Ace in the Hole08101329249
19Rye Racquet Club: Overserved08111229223
20WTC: Double Shots08121231233
21Club Fit JV Aces0891231235
22Club Fit Briarcliff Dare Doubles08101432241
23New Rochelle Racquet Club: Harley Queens0881533235
24Sportime HI: Flint Park Village People0881534256
25Yonkers Tennis Center0851937251
26Hardscrabble Tempest0861838260
27Match Point Rockland Raquettes0861838250
28WTC: Slice Girls0841839260
29TCH: Queens of the Court0851939254
30Grand Slam Overserved0851940259

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Jennifer Naso
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Audrey Smith
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.28
Katie Benedict
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Sarah Raeben
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Alison Bonaviso
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Kayleigh Vogel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Medea Elvy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Sandy Kim
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Athena Maikish
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Elana Minkove
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.79
Kerry Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Karen Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Veronica Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Denise Mathieson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lindsey Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Miriam Morrow
published
Patrice Fitzpatrick
published
Robyn Rosenberg
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Trish Pretl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Benedict + Sarah Raeben32560% games+7.9% vs expected
Audrey Smith + Jennifer Naso8352% games+6.9% vs expected
Alison Bonaviso + Jennifer Naso6071% gamesnot enough data
Elana Minkove + Athena Maikish224 matchesnot enough data
Robyn Rosenberg + Sarah Raeben224 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Roberts + Athena Maikish224 matchesnot enough data
Denise Mathieson + Trish Pretl123 matchesnot enough data
Elana Minkove + Robyn Rosenberg033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Naso
100W–44L career · 11 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Audrey Smith
57W–27L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Katie Benedict
89W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Sarah Raeben
100W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Alison Bonaviso
89W–78L career · 6 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.14
Kayleigh Vogel
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
Medea Elvy
52W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
Sandy Kim
30W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Athena Maikish
50W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
2.94
Elana Minkove
100W–81L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
Kerry Roberts
33W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Karen Lee
32W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Veronica Barnes
32W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
0%49%51%
2.50
3
Denise Mathieson
16W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
93%7%<1%
2.29
Lindsey Anderson
24W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Miriam Morrow
3W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patrice Fitzpatrick
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robyn Rosenberg
30W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Trish Pretl
14W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.