Teams

SOL: Wise Aces: Nair/Gillott

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Men Summer · 4.0 Men

20 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-18vs NC:Extreme:SmockLost 13
W#1 DoublesMichael Distefano / Adrian Schwartz vs James Glynn / John Tolva6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichael Flaherty vs Paul Ambler1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndres Castano / Rob Slosberg vs Julian Banerji / Chris Smock2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Allan / Unni Nair vs Peter Avellone / Lucas Sosnow4-6, 3-6
2026-07-11vs NC:Extreme:SmockSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAdrian Schwartz / Matthew Allan vs Paul Ambler / John Tolva2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Flaherty vs EJ Crawford6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndres Castano / Michael Distefano vs Hadi Tabbaa / Ken Nakamura7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKunal Maini / Unni Nair vs Chris Smock / Julian Banerji0-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesAdrian Schwartz / Mitchell Nadel vs David Chaskin / Michael Boehme6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMatthew Allan / Unni Nair vs Abhinav Nilaratna / Robert Pavoni5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErnst Schaumburg / Rob Slosberg vs Troy Lochner / Michael Piera2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-20vs WST:Jenkins/BruckWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Neuner / Michael Boardman vs Kevin Scanlan / David Kaplan6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMichael Flaherty vs Eric Anderson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Distefano / Tarek Hallaba vs Michael Berkin / James Jenkins0-6, 3-6
2026-06-13vs MIT: Madmen: Millward/ColeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesUnni Nair / Gregg Ruais vs Vincent Averaimo / Kurt Leon6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Flaherty vs Dinesh Singh6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAdrian Schwartz / Rob Slosberg vs Thomas MacRe Jr / Keith Coley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-07vs WRC:Weston Whalers:Linker/GuerraLost 13
L#1 DoublesMitchell Nadel / Jeffrey Tamis vs Jay Bockhaus / Jonathan Lieber3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Flaherty vs Robert Malhotra7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMatthew Allan / Unni Nair vs David Linker / Gavin Guerra6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarian Pavlus / Tarek Hallaba vs Evan Nadel / Greg Shamie3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-17vs KH: Whalers: Presley/KimLost 13
L#1 DoublesAdrian Schwartz / Jeffrey Tamis vs Peter Garabet / Paul Smailes3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Flaherty vs Robby Woodbury6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMitchell Nadel / Michael Distefano vs Kevin Dahl / James Katis3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKunal Maini / Ernst Schaumburg vs Dale Kim / Ari Greenman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJoseph Brasile / Robert Neuner vs David van Zyl / Dennis Russell7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMichael Flaherty vs Gregory Francis7-5, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFilip Wouters / Rob Slosberg vs Keith Cipollaro / Michael Boehme1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGregg Ruais / Marian Pavlus vs Nico VandeWoestijne / Michael Bloomenthal5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NC: Lord of the Strings: Friese/Seah07111735277
2KH: Whalers: Presley/Kim0824818225
3TCT: Tennis of Trumbull: Pagano/Russell08211027255
4MIT: Madmen: Millward/Coley08161639298
5WRC:Weston Whalers:Linker/Guerra08141843322
6WST:Jenkins/Bruck08112145313
7SOL: Wise Aces: Nair/Gillott08102145331
8NC:Extreme:Smock09201637298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Michael Boardman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Rudolf van Mol
published
3.86
Adrian Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.80
Mitchell Nadel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Michael Flaherty
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.76
Filip Wouters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Andres Castano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Michael Distefano
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.74
Robert Neuner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Joseph Brasile
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Jeffrey Tamis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Marian Pavlus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Unni Nair
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.52
Gregg Ruais
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.52
Rob Slosberg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Matthew Allan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Kunal Maini
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.47
Ernst Schaumburg
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.46
Brian Gillott
published 4
3.19
Tarek Hallaba
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ernst Schaumburg + Unni Nair10161% games+11.0% vs expected
Ernst Schaumburg + Kunal Maini9361% games+10.4% vs expected
Unni Nair + Kunal Maini4451% games−0.4% vs expected
Robert Neuner + Jeffrey Tamis3349% games−8.5% vs expected
Ernst Schaumburg + Gregg Ruais5070% gamesnot enough data
Kunal Maini + Matthew Allan3262% gamesnot enough data
Tarek Hallaba + Brian Gillott134 matchesnot enough data
Unni Nair + Matthew Allan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Boardman
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
Rudolf van Mol
327W–239L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Adrian Schwartz
20W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Mitchell Nadel
52W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Michael Flaherty
91W–74L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Filip Wouters
54W–56L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Andres Castano
4W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Distefano
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
Robert Neuner
28W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Joseph Brasile
48W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Jeffrey Tamis
58W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
Marian Pavlus
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Unni Nair
152W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Gregg Ruais
54W–29L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
Rob Slosberg
107W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Matthew Allan
68W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Kunal Maini
178W–70L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Ernst Schaumburg
64W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
4
Brian Gillott
18W–38L career · no lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Tarek Hallaba
19W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.