Teams

KH: Whalers: Presley/Kim

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Men Summer · 4.0 Men

21 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-19vs MIT: Madmen: Millward/ColeyWon 20
W#1 DoublesRishi Narang / Robert Franchini vs Keith Coley / Willard Smith6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRene del Portillo / Dave Jia Li vs Don Gustavson / Tyler Bowden7-5, 6-2
2026-07-15vs WRC:Weston Whalers:Linker/GuerraSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPaul Smailes / Robert Franchini vs Evan Nadel / Frank Iannella6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEric Nadler vs Jacob Ceisler4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDale Kim / Dave Jia Li vs Greg Shamie / James Ardrey6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJason Minoff / Rishi Narang vs Sohel Islam / Stephen Finkelstein1-6, 3-6
2026-07-08vs WRC:Weston Whalers:Linker/GuerraSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDale Kim / James Katis vs Jay Bockhaus / Jonathan Lieber7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBen Connard vs Stephen Finkelstein6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEric Nadler / Robby Woodbury vs Frank Iannella / Evan Nadel2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAri Greenman / Jason Minoff vs David Linker / Sohel Islam6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-13vs NC:Extreme:SmockWon 31
W#1 DoublesDale Kim / Rishi Narang vs Ken Nakamura / John Tolva6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAndrew Roth vs Lucas Sosnow6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRene del Portillo / Robby Woodbury vs Paul Ambler / James Glynn4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Garabet / James Katis vs EJ Crawford / Chris Smock6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesDale Kim / Peter Garabet vs Joseph Lucibello / Keith Cipollaro4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrew Roth vs Tommy Roy6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobert Franchini / Kevin Dahl vs Thomas Santilli / Michael Bloomenthal6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEric Nadler / Ben Connard vs Michael Boehme / Abhinav Nilaratna2-6, 2-6
2026-05-31vs MIT: Madmen: Millward/ColeyWon 31
W#1 DoublesRishi Narang / Peter Garabet vs Jaspreet Kohli / Thomas MacRe Jr7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBen Connard vs Kurt Leon6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRene del Portillo / Chris Foster vs Keith Coley / Willard Smith7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDale Kim / Brian Youngs vs Mike Visnic / James Millward6-3, 6-0
2026-05-17vs SOL: Wise Aces: Nair/GillottWon 31
W#1 DoublesPeter Garabet / Paul Smailes vs Adrian Schwartz / Jeffrey Tamis6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRobby Woodbury vs Michael Flaherty4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKevin Dahl / James Katis vs Mitchell Nadel / Michael Distefano6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDale Kim / Ari Greenman vs Kunal Maini / Ernst Schaumburg6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-03vs WST:Jenkins/BruckWon 30
W#1 DoublesDale Kim / Rishi Narang vs James Jenkins / David Kaplan6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Vendig / James Katis vs Howard Bruck / Jeffrey Winter6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndrew Roth / Paul Smailes vs Michael Berkin / Brian Lehrer6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesDale Kim / Rishi Narang vs Michael Propst / Ryan Jones6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAndrew Roth vs AUGUSTO ROMERO6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChris Smailes / Kevin Dahl vs David Mikulecky / David Seah6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NC: Lord of the Strings: Friese/Seah07111735277
2KH: Whalers: Presley/Kim0824818225
3TCT: Tennis of Trumbull: Pagano/Russell08211027255
4MIT: Madmen: Millward/Coley08161639298
5WRC:Weston Whalers:Linker/Guerra08141843322
6WST:Jenkins/Bruck08112145313
7SOL: Wise Aces: Nair/Gillott08102145331
8NC:Extreme:Smock09201637298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Dale Kim
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.98
Andrew Roth
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.98
Peter Garabet
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.95
Paul Smailes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Dave Jia Li
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Rishi Narang
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.89
Robert Franchini
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
James Katis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Chris Smailes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Ben Connard
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Kevin Dahl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Rene del Portillo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Brian Vendig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Eric Nadler
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Alan Rissolo
published 4
Bryan Meltzer
published 4
3.66
Jason Minoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Robby Woodbury
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.53
Ari Greenman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brian Youngs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Douglas Presley
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Smailes + Paul Smailes6260% games+8.2% vs expected
Rishi Narang + Dale Kim9358% games+7.7% vs expected
Robert Franchini + Kevin Dahl6157% games+3.9% vs expected
Rene del Portillo + James Katis7160% games+3.6% vs expected
Rishi Narang + Jason Minoff2342% gamesnot enough data
Rishi Narang + Rene del Portillo4159% gamesnot enough data
James Katis + Dale Kim4161% gamesnot enough data
Rishi Narang + Robert Franchini404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dale Kim
68W–26L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Andrew Roth
57W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
Peter Garabet
20W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
Paul Smailes
44W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Dave Jia Li
85W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.94
Rishi Narang
38W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Robert Franchini
17W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
James Katis
78W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Chris Smailes
26W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Ben Connard
94W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
Kevin Dahl
17W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Rene del Portillo
83W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Brian Vendig
12W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Eric Nadler
23W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Alan Rissolo
19W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Bryan Meltzer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jason Minoff
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.66
Robby Woodbury
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Ari Greenman
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Brian Youngs
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Douglas Presley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.