Teams

Hebert/18/2.5/Combo/WD/OCC

2026 LAF Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 2.5 Laf (18&O) Women Day

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-25vs Boudreaux/18/2.5/Combo/WD/REDSWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Glover / Renee Langlinais vs Amy Boudreaux / Jillian Gabal6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMackenzie Hebert / Emily Jordan vs April Ledet / Jamie Veverica6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVictoria Cobo / Summer Viator vs Melanie Hoffpauir / Jordan Dugas6-2, 6-0
2026-08-18vs Boudreaux/18/2.5/Combo/WD/REDSWon 30
W#1 DoublesRenee Langlinais / Emily Jordan vs Toni Castille / Gabrielle Boudreaux6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMackenzie Hebert / Victoria Cobo vs Jillian Gabal / Jamie Veverica6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSummer Viator / Kimberly Fontenot vs Melanie Hoffpauir / Lyndley McNabb6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Laf (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Kathryn Glover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Renee Langlinais
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Emily Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.46
Ashley Horaist
published 2.5
2.45
Victoria Cobo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Mackenzie Hebert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Amelie Abshire
published 2.5
Summer Viator
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Glover + Renee Langlinais4159% games+11.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Glover
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%19%81%
2.61
Renee Langlinais
9W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%22%78%
2.60
2.5
Emily Jordan
10W–13L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Ashley Horaist
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
Victoria Cobo
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
Mackenzie Hebert
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.42
2.5
Amelie Abshire
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Summer Viator
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.