Teams

Boudreaux/18/2.5/Combo/WD/REDS

2026 LAF Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 2.5 Laf (18&O) Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-25vs Hebert/18/2.5/Combo/WD/OCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Boudreaux / Jillian Gabal vs Kathryn Glover / Renee Langlinais3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesApril Ledet / Jamie Veverica vs Mackenzie Hebert / Emily Jordan4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Hoffpauir / Jordan Dugas vs Victoria Cobo / Summer Viator2-6, 0-6
2026-08-18vs Hebert/18/2.5/Combo/WD/OCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesToni Castille / Gabrielle Boudreaux vs Renee Langlinais / Emily Jordan2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJillian Gabal / Jamie Veverica vs Mackenzie Hebert / Victoria Cobo2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMelanie Hoffpauir / Lyndley McNabb vs Summer Viator / Kimberly Fontenot3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Laf (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.31
April Ledet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.21
Toni Castille
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.04
Melanie Hoffpauir
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.92
Gabrielle Boudreaux
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jamie Veverica
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jillian Gabal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jordan Dugas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lyndley McNabb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rachelle Lanclos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jillian Gabal + Jamie Veverica134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
April Ledet
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Toni Castille
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Melanie Hoffpauir
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Gabrielle Boudreaux
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Jamie Veverica
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jillian Gabal
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jordan Dugas
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lyndley McNabb
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rachelle Lanclos
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.