Teams

Cook-Shot Placers

2023 One Doubles-Winter · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-02vs Hewitt/Clarke-Rowley SistersLost 01
L#1 DoublesMicki Hulscher / Doreen Gavin vs Kelly Hewitt / Wendy Clarke6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-28vs SeveyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ray / Sheila Ryan vs Elizabeth Sevey / Kristen Schnabel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-21vs Tan/Mills-Dare DoublesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ray / Doreen Gavin vs Mary Sheryll Tan / Jennifer Ivester2-6, 4-6
2023-03-05vs Nguyen/Tilney-Whittier Tennis ClubLost 01
L#1 DoublesMicki Hulscher / Sheila Ryan vs HA NGUYEN / Carolyn Tilney3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kwok7272669
2Nguyen/Tilney-Whittier Tennis Club6161234
3Washington - All about that Ace6161550
4Boice-Chic Kickers6363771
5Hudson-Hit it one more x6363882
6Dizon-Doubles Trouble6363985
7Hewitt/Clarke-Rowley Sisters5252541
8Monson4343655
9Oly McKay-Zhao45451081
10Neigel-Shake That Ace45451190
11Tan/Mills-Dare Doubles3434968
12Sevey25251177
13Herrick-Net Results272715104
14Cook-Shot Placers15151169
15Srein/Ly-The Rice Serve06061273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Micki Hulscher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Doreen Gavin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Sheila Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Jennifer Ray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.74
Karen Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheila Ryan + Micki Hulscher4348% games−1.6% vs expected
Doreen Gavin + Micki Hulscher111947% games−4.1% vs expected
Sheila Ryan + Jennifer Ray123 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Ryan + Doreen Gavin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Micki Hulscher
43W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Doreen Gavin
29W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Sheila Ryan
43W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Jennifer Ray
62W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Karen Cook
24W–116L career · 1 line in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.