Teams

Hudson-Hit it one more x

2023 One Doubles-Winter · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-04-14vs KwokLost 01
L#1 DoublesMAIMAI BENSON / Lisa Hudson vs Beshka Lewis / Mayumi Barber3-6, 3-6
2023-04-08vs Dizon-Doubles TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Brinkhaus / Lisa Hudson vs Carol Peebles / Nikki Dizon6-7, 6-7
2023-04-07vs Oly McKay-ZhaoWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Hudson / Angela Brinkhaus vs Maria Robinson / Kathi McKay4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-30vs Norris/LakeyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMAIMAI BENSON / Kim Nazzal vs Heidi Lakey / Alexandrea Norris6-3, 6-1
2023-03-05vs SlaterLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Hudson / MAIMAI BENSON vs Tina Slater / Briana Slater3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-03-02vs McLaughlin/O'HalloranWon 10
W#1 DoublesMAIMAI BENSON / Kim Nazzal vs Chino Mclaughlin / Amanda O'Halloran6-4, 6-3
2023-02-23vs Boice-Chic KickersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Nazzal / Lisa Hudson vs Maya Kocian / Angela Boice4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-04vs Herrick-Net ResultsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMAIMAI BENSON / Kim Nazzal vs Charlet Herrick / Debra Moody7-5, 6-3
2023-02-04vs Neigel-Shake That AceWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngela Brinkhaus / Lisa Hudson vs Alexis Neigel / Megan Arriola6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kwok7272669
2Nguyen/Tilney-Whittier Tennis Club6161234
3Washington - All about that Ace6161550
4Boice-Chic Kickers6363771
5Hudson-Hit it one more x6363882
6Dizon-Doubles Trouble6363985
7Hewitt/Clarke-Rowley Sisters5252541
8Monson4343655
9Oly McKay-Zhao45451081
10Neigel-Shake That Ace45451190
11Tan/Mills-Dare Doubles3434968
12Sevey25251177
13Herrick-Net Results272715104
14Cook-Shot Placers15151169
15Srein/Ly-The Rice Serve06061273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Kim Nazzal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
MAIMAI BENSON
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.23
Angela Brinkhaus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Lisa Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MAIMAI BENSON + Kim Nazzal12159% games+1.5% vs expected
Angela Brinkhaus + Lisa Hudson5649% games−5.6% vs expected
MAIMAI BENSON + Lisa Hudson8754% games−6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kim Nazzal
102W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
MAIMAI BENSON
141W–83L career · 5 lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.31
3.5
Angela Brinkhaus
152W–100L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Lisa Hudson
114W–104L career · 6 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.