Teams

Okaloosa/Garfield/18&Over3.5W

2023 OWB Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-25vs FWBTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Sherman / Rachel Tritz vs Sheri Clancy / Anastacia Dawson6-2, 6-3
2023-06-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesMegan Sherman / Rachel Tritz vs Kristina Cook / Rachel Stone6-1, 6-3
2023-06-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesMegan Sherman / Rachel Tritz vs Marcia Baris-Sanders / Donna Ansell6-0, 6-4
2023-06-02vs FWBTCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesFlavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny vs Rachel Stone7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMegan Sherman / Rachel Tritz vs Allison Phillips / Alicia Roberson2-6, 3-6
2023-05-19vs FWBTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMegan Sherman / Rachel Tritz vs Kristina Cook / Marcia Baris-Sanders6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesFlavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny vs Sheri Clancy6-0, 6-1
2023-05-12vs FWBTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesFlavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny / Tami Groth vs Allison Phillips / Alicia Roberson7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMegan Sherman / Rachel Tritz vs Laura Howard / Sheri Clancy3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Rachel Tritz
published
3.47
Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.44
Megan Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Melanie Schweizer
published
3.27
Tami Groth
published
Jennifer Schweikert
published
Kassia Garfield
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Sherman + Melanie Schweizer224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Tritz
122W–57L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
4
Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny
60W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
Megan Sherman
37W–32L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Melanie Schweizer
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
Tami Groth
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Jennifer Schweikert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kassia Garfield
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.