Teams

Sports Mall-Majors/Jensen

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.56 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-01vs RISE AC-Kemp/PearceSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKari Majors / Brenda Green vs Keri Masson / Allison Mangelson2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAngela Jensen / Camille Weaver vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-25vs Park City MARC-ByrneWon 20
W#2 DoublesKat Fuller / Camille Weaver vs Tricia Byrne / Melanie Schlachter6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCosette Tregeagle vs Darla Cardwell4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-18Split 11
L#1 DoublesKari Majors / Martha Brown vs Jaime Vance / Jennifer Tooley4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAngela Jensen / Camille Weaver vs Mary Jayne Child / Sherrie Hatch3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-04Split 11
L#1 SinglesCosette Tregeagle vs Hannah Russell4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBrenda Green / Camille Weaver vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-27vs Ivory Ridge-McCord/WilyWon 20
W#2 DoublesKari Majors / Kat Fuller vs Gayle Waldron / Elizabeth West7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngela Jensen / Camille Weaver vs Heidi Beckstead / Shellie Black6-3, 7-5
2022-04-20vs Wasatch Rec Center-DavisWon 20
W#2 DoublesKari Majors / Camille Weaver vs Wendy Heywood / Alyse Luster6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngela Jensen / Cosette Tregeagle vs Katie Studdert / Angela Ritchie6-4, 6-4
2022-04-13vs RISE AC-Kemp/PearceWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartha Brown / Kari Majors vs Angie Hoggan / Keri Masson6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Martha Brown
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.85
Trisha Cutrer
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.84
Kat Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Amber Thompson
usually #1 Singles 27%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.40
Julie Black
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.25
Brenda Green
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Hediyeh Baradaran
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Lisa Beames
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.17
Camille Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cosette Tregeagle
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Angela Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Jeri Nichols
published
Kari Majors
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Majors + Trisha Cutrer14064% games+13.4% vs expected
Kat Fuller + Martha Brown12565% games+13.0% vs expected
Kat Fuller + Trisha Cutrer362357% games+12.2% vs expected
Camille Weaver + Brenda Green10158% games+10.6% vs expected
Amber Thompson + Julie Black13271% games+10.4% vs expected
Kari Majors + Brenda Green10261% games+10.3% vs expected
Amber Thompson + Martha Brown5164% games+8.7% vs expected
Angela Jensen + Cosette Tregeagle5455% games+5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Brown
202W–72L career · 15 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Trisha Cutrer
216W–112L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Kat Fuller
131W–95L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Amber Thompson
131W–110L career · 13 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Julie Black
68W–14L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Brenda Green
130W–69L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Hediyeh Baradaran
40W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Lisa Beames
158W–139L career · 11 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Camille Weaver
141W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Cosette Tregeagle
34W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Angela Jensen
98W–97L career · 10 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
Jeri Nichols
36W–58L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.50
Kari Majors
71W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.