Teams

OC Lifetime RSC - Kelly

2025 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC 4.0W WD

20 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-27Won 10
W#2 SinglesMariela Farley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-20vs OC Newport Beach TC - Nedra - 10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Harris / Mariela Farley vs Anne Marie Block / Gina Cereda3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-06vs OC Dana Hills - SueWon 32
W#1 DoublesKathy Salter / Kelly Stacy vs Holly Wyler / Denise Banks6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesShelby Houle vs Vivian Nevin4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJacquelyn Warbiany / Tracey Fulford vs Lisa Stone / Lynn Kamada6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEmma Robinson vs Sue Shin6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMissy Berchiolli / Christine Griffith vs Suzanne Corvese / Kim Mccloskey6-2, 6-0
2025-05-27vs OC Coto De Caza - TracieWon 10
W#1 DoublesMariela Farley / Kathy Salter vs Tammy Hyland / Ulrike Leivici7-5, 7-6
W#1 DoublesMariela Farley / Julie Vivalda vs Claudia Spaulding / Deborah Miller6-3, 6-2
2025-05-13vs OC Lifetime - BevWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Salter / Mariela Farley vs Lynn Moore / Christine Reenders6-2, 7-5
2025-05-09vs OC LLW Net Assets - Gina JacobsLost 05
L#1 DoublesMissy Berchiolli / Kristin Jones vs Michelle Smith / Christy Dozor3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEmma Robinson vs Daniela Schardinger3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Duenas / Elizabeth Harris vs Jill Hauk / Stacy Ison2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKelly Tremmel vs Heather Sepulveda1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Frohlich / Christine Griffith vs Alisa Gentry / Courtney Zani2-6, 3-6
2025-05-02vs OC Costa Mesa TC - Miki - 11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Salter / Mariela Farley vs Janet Wang / Junko Aoki6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Harris / Mariela Farley vs Sharon Fujihara / Julie Vislay6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christine Parry
published 4
3.69
Michelle Duenas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Ladawn Stone
published
3.62
Marcella Cangelosi
published
3.60
Missy Berchiolli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Mariela Farley
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.53
Julie Vivalda
published
3.51
Michelle Frohlich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Kathy Salter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Jessica Papell
published
3.45
Kelly Tremmel
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Shelby Houle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Kelly Stacy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Christine Griffith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Jacquelyn Warbiany
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Heather Donovan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Melissa Hill
published
Elizabeth Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emma Robinson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Tracey Fulford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Duenas + Kathy Salter4354% games+8.9% vs expected
Christine Griffith + Missy Berchiolli4844% games−1.8% vs expected
Kathy Salter + Kelly Stacy314 matchesnot enough data
Christine Griffith + Michelle Frohlich033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Parry
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Duenas
12W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
Ladawn Stone
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Marcella Cangelosi
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Missy Berchiolli
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Mariela Farley
40W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Julie Vivalda
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Michelle Frohlich
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
Kathy Salter
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Jessica Papell
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Kelly Tremmel
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Shelby Houle
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Kelly Stacy
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
3.5
Christine Griffith
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
Jacquelyn Warbiany
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.41
Heather Donovan
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Melissa Hill
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
Elizabeth Harris
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Emma Robinson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracey Fulford
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.