Teams

Greenhill/Roberts-Milam W4.0S

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

20 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Janine Pesusich
published
3.80
April Parker
published 4
3.79
Erin Lange
published 4
3.78
Julie Hoang
published
3.57
Diamira Avila
published 4
3.54
Michelle Buchanan
published
3.51
REGINA RIVERA
published
3.48
Hilary Roberts
published 4
3.46
Stacy Revely
published
3.43
Mary Helen Nine
published
3.30
Myung McClure
published
3.30
Avari Garcia
published 3.5
3.29
Sarah Jimenez
published
3.28
Katherine Rader
published
3.27
Evyn Fairman
published 3.5
Jennifer Richter
published
Kathy Engelbrecht
published
Laurel White
published
Stephanie Pfleghaar
published
Tamra Bryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Richter + Mary Helen Nine1536% games+4.5% vs expected
Myung McClure + Hilary Roberts134 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Buchanan + Julie Hoang314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Helen Nine + Julie Hoang134 matchesnot enough data
Laurel White + Avari Garcia213 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Roberts + Stephanie Pfleghaar033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janine Pesusich
55W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
April Parker
22W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Erin Lange
61W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
Julie Hoang
55W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Diamira Avila
45W–26L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.57
Michelle Buchanan
25W–20L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
REGINA RIVERA
24W–48L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Hilary Roberts
10W–23L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Stacy Revely
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Mary Helen Nine
10W–26L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.43
Myung McClure
5W–23L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Avari Garcia
22W–35L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Sarah Jimenez
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Katherine Rader
31W–32L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Evyn Fairman
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Jennifer Richter
24W–35L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Engelbrecht
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurel White
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Pfleghaar
1W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tamra Bryan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.