← Search

Stephanie Pfleghaar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Murphy, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 8W–19L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history27 matches
L
2026-03-02 · High Point/Dwiggins W8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Dwiggins
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-23 · High Point/Dwiggins W8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacy Revely
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-10 · High Point/Dwiggins W8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Toni Harrigan
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-09 · High Point/Dwiggins W8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacy Revely
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-05 · High Point/Dwiggins W8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deanna Williams
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-12 · High Point/Dwiggins W8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Adams
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-03 · High Point/Dwiggins W8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Nail
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-02-26 · High Point/Dwiggins W8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hilary Roberts
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-24 · High Point/Dwiggins W8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hilary Roberts
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-17 · High Point/Dwiggins W8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deanna Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-03 · High Point/Dwiggins W8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Nail
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-10 · Greenhill/Garcia-Richter W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hilary Roberts
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 48.4% of games
8.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 32.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer