Teams

Borthwick/Bowden Simply Smashing 6.0 ES23

2023 MIXED 18 & OVER EARLY START · 6.0 MX

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-09vs Stordahl: Kelly's Heroes 6.0 ES23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRuth Eliason / Doug Henrich vs Paul Penningroth / Gretchen Schroeder4-6, 4-6
2022-11-18vs Legris/Moore 6.0 ES23Won 10
W#2 DoublesRuth Eliason / Doug Henrich vs Sandra Moore / Ben Blair6-4, 7-6
2022-11-11vs Altendahl 6.0 ES23Won 10
W#1 DoublesRuth Eliason / Dave Nash vs KJ Madison / Hiawatha Smith6-4, 6-1
2022-10-21vs Fredrickson 6.0 ES23Won 10
W#1 DoublesDave Nash / Ruth Eliason vs Michele Fredrickson / ALTAF SHAIK6-4, 6-2
2022-10-14vs Legris/Moore 6.0 ES23Won 10
W#1 DoublesDave Nash / Ruth Eliason vs Ben Blair / Sandra Moore6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 MX have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Pam Bowden
published
3.43
Ellen Dobbins
published 3.5
3.37
Ruth Eliason
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Cory Borthwick
published 3.5
2.77
Cameron Olig
published 3
James Bowden
published 3
2.75
2.68
Wanda Makis
published
2.27
Dave Nash
published 2.5
2.25
Doug Henrich
published 2.5
Keith Dobbins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cory Borthwick + Dave Nash303 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Dobbins + Dave Nash303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Bowden
31W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Ellen Dobbins
50W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
Ruth Eliason
263W–178L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Cory Borthwick
22W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.09
3
Cameron Olig
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
James Bowden
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Sheppard Pearson
35W–32L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Wanda Makis
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Dave Nash
9W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Doug Henrich
7W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
Keith Dobbins
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.