Teams

FTA18A/Brookstone/Duffy

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - FTA Sunday · 3.5 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.45 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-27vs FTA18A/Cardinal/RoodLost 23
L#1 DoublesMelodee Rosopa / Ashley Sumner vs Caroline Carter / Sara Mower5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Burdette vs Kimberly Pearigen2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Plummer / Carol Douglas vs Kellar Rogers / Jessica Heller6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAimee Duffy vs Abby Smith6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnnette Curin / Kristi King-Brock vs Valerie Mattingly / Crystal Cleveland6-4, 6-2
2025-04-08vs FTA18A/GCC/HillWon 32
L#1 DoublesMelodee Rosopa / Annette Curin vs Carrie Ann Twedt / Tracy O'Shea7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndrea Burdette vs Elizabeth Philmon7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAshley Shuler / Carol Douglas vs Ali Hill / Andrea Bryan4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAimee Duffy vs Melissa Richardson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeah Winton / Kristi King-Brock vs Rhonda Jackson / Maria Vogt6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-03-30vs FTA18A/ACACSportsclub/BranhamLost 05
L#1 DoublesAndrea Burdette / Annette Curin vs Julie Branham / Maria Gulli5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMadisen Curin vs Alyssa Monday2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAimee Duffy / Deana Fisher vs Hope Moriarty / Jessica Bobbie5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLaura Mullinax vs Lauren Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Plummer / Ashley Shuler vs Michelle Scott / Anne Flink4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Daniela Robertson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Caroline Stewart
published 3.5
3.19
Ashley Sumner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Carol Douglas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Annette Curin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Dawn Rowley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Andrea Burdette
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Kara Powder
published
3.04
Doni Willmering
published
2.98
Julie Plummer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Leah Winton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Pamela Brooks
published
2.97
Aimee Duffy
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Laura Mullinax
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.89
Kristi King-Brock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Deana Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.80
Melodee Rosopa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ashley Shuler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jennifer Moran
published
Madisen Curin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Powder + Andrea Burdette6163% games+12.7% vs expected
Kristi King-Brock + Leah Winton12558% games+10.1% vs expected
Doni Willmering + Deana Fisher2443% games+3.7% vs expected
Kara Powder + Carol Douglas5150% games+3.4% vs expected
Dawn Rowley + Carol Douglas224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Plummer + Annette Curin224 matchesnot enough data
Doni Willmering + Annette Curin134 matchesnot enough data
Melodee Rosopa + Annette Curin314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniela Robertson
18W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Caroline Stewart
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ashley Sumner
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Carol Douglas
23W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Annette Curin
35W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Dawn Rowley
30W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Andrea Burdette
42W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Kara Powder
33W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Doni Willmering
25W–25L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Julie Plummer
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Leah Winton
39W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Pamela Brooks
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Aimee Duffy
26W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Laura Mullinax
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
Kristi King-Brock
54W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
3.5
Deana Fisher
14W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.83
Melodee Rosopa
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
3
Ashley Shuler
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Moran
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Madisen Curin
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.