Teams

Brogden 55s 3.5M Mon PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · MEN 3.5 55 & Over Mon PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-05vs Wright/Boxley 55s 3.5M Mon PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesTim Hayworth / Cal Kimrey vs Jason Beuchler / Wade Legette1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesScott Urquhart / Dave Critchley vs Ames Chamberlin / Mark Sullivan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-28vs GILMAN 55s 3.5M Mon PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesLee Brogden / Tim Hayworth vs Jeff Cunningham / Stephen Romaine6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Dutton / Steven Brackman vs John Gilman / Jeffery Ward4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRussell Loseke / Scott Urquhart vs Jeff Ryding / Carl Crowder6-2, 6-3
2025-04-21vs Pretzsch 55s 3.5M Mon PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulian Zhu / Tim Hayworth vs Randy Carter / Joe Carruthers3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesScott Urquhart / James Beardsley vs David Rachels / Robert Gay2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCal Kimrey / John Dutton vs Gilbert Andia / John Cobb6-7, 5-7
2025-04-19vs Bellas 55s 3.5M Mon PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesDave Critchley / Julian Zhu vs Tony Alford / Kevin Herndon2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Wasserman / Russell Loseke vs William Johnson / Michael Tyson6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesScott Urquhart / James Beardsley vs Mitch White / Michael Bellas2-6, 1-6
2025-04-14vs Kobi-Jackson 55s 3.5M Mon PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLee Brogden / John Dutton vs Ewing Carter Iii / Toni Rodriguez4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Wasserman / Keith Pearson vs Syed Arfeen / Tanvir Chodri6-0, 6-2
2025-04-13vs Schneiderman 55s 3.5M Mon PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesLee Brogden / Craig Wasserman vs Timothy Shantry / Steven Delamar2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Brackman / Todd Schwarz vs Lee Schneiderman / Kenton Kreager2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJulian Zhu / Dave Critchley vs Jeff Shue / Alejandro Rutty1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-24vs Patterson 55s 3.5M Mon PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesRussell Loseke / James Beardsley vs David Grubbs / Jeff Kirby2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Brackman / Tim Hayworth vs Martin Mailloux / Tony Lancaster2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Dutton / Keith Pearson vs Bryan Bly / Brian Smith4-6, 4-6
2025-03-17vs Ysidron/Barnes 55s 3.5M Mon PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Dutton / Tim Hayworth vs Kevin Blackman / Pat Hogan6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLee Brogden / Craig Wasserman vs Danny Finnegan / Edward Mulvey6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDave Critchley / Julian Zhu vs William Davis / Glenn Gorman6-2, 6-3
2025-03-10vs Clowers 55s 3.5M Mon PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Dutton / Tim Hayworth vs Eric Tedford / Roy Malac6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Wasserman / Russell Loseke vs Brian Newton / Dennis Stearns6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDave Critchley / James Beardsley vs Charles Renfro / Ed Widman6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 55 & Over Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Tim Hayworth
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.27
Cal Kimrey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Craig Wasserman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
John Dutton
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.16
Dave Critchley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Lee Brogden
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
James Beardsley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Julian Zhu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Keith Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Russell Loseke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Steven Brackman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Todd Schwarz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Wasserman + Lee Brogden1447% games−5.5% vs expected
Julian Zhu + Dave Critchley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Hayworth
8W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Cal Kimrey
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Craig Wasserman
19W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
John Dutton
22W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Dave Critchley
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Lee Brogden
8W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
James Beardsley
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julian Zhu
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keith Pearson
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Russell Loseke
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Brackman
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Schwarz
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.