Teams

SCTA/Stacee Mceldoon

2025 SCTA Winter '24 · '25 - USTA Adult 18 & Over

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Denney / Stacee Mceldoon vs Kerri Edwards / Amanda Page6-3, 6-2
2025-01-14vs Highgrove - Wall/KennyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Denney / Jessica Weeks vs Brooke Gammill / Autumn Cheely6-0, 6-7, 6-2
2025-01-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Denney / Stacee Mceldoon vs Kerri Edwards / Vanessa Siguenza6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · '25 - USTA Adult 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SCTA/Stacee Mceldoon8031926318

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Stacee Mceldoon
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.31
Tamara LeClair
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
3.27
Lindsay Hepler
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.15
Kimberly Mulkey
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #4 Doubles 27% · published
3.00
Jennifer Denney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Pamela Saylor
usually #4 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
2.94
Dana Lezaj
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.83
Renee Awtry
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
2.79
Amie Craddock
usually #3 Doubles 32%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published 3
2.78
Cathy Chordegian
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Kristin Hancock
usually #4 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
2.76
Jacqueline Wheeler
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.72
Jennifer Hazelton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.69
Sherry Stinson Oliver
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.63
Bonnie Jones
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Vanessa Corbin
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jessica Weeks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kelli Brewer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Hancock + Amie Craddock0539% games−0.9% vs expected
Jacqueline Wheeler + Jennifer Hazelton4349% gamesnot enough data
Stacee Mceldoon + Jennifer Denney224 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Wheeler + Kristin Hancock404 matchesnot enough data
Renee Awtry + Cathy Chordegian134 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Saylor + Kristin Hancock314 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Hepler + Amie Craddock224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Hazelton + Amie Craddock033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacee Mceldoon
42W–21L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Tamara LeClair
62W–43L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Lindsay Hepler
17W–15L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Kimberly Mulkey
28W–30L career · 10 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Denney
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Pamela Saylor
13W–14L career · 9 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Dana Lezaj
17W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
Renee Awtry
17W–29L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Amie Craddock
29W–48L career · 19 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Cathy Chordegian
17W–21L career · 15 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Kristin Hancock
14W–33L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Jacqueline Wheeler
14W–15L career · 10 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
Jennifer Hazelton
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Sherry Stinson Oliver
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Bonnie Jones
9W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Vanessa Corbin
8W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Jessica Weeks
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelli Brewer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.