Teams

Rhoads/18/2.5/CWN/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 2.5 Shrev

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-19vs Tipton/18/2.5/CWN/QTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Nelson / Emily Colvin vs Tracy Brawley / Heather Prator5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTracie Simmons / April Lee vs Marie Rogers / Katie Dyer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBlair Culbreath / Amy Jacobs vs Madison Edwards / Dion Stripland6-2, 6-2
2026-08-12vs Holt-Day/18/2.5/CWN/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCamille Rhoads / Michelle Nelson vs Allison Goins / Olivia Goldman0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Jacobs / Ashley Durr vs Kelly Wheeler / Sundi Littleton1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBlair Culbreath / Emily Colvin vs Kirsten Day / Brandi Sharkey3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Emily Cristler
published
2.34
Blair Culbreath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Amy Jacobs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Ashley Durr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Camille Rhoads
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.99
Tracie Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
April Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.88
Stephanie Stults
published
1.83
Emily Colvin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Durr + Amy Jacobs059% gamesnot enough data
Emily Colvin + Blair Culbreath044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Cristler
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.48
2.5
Blair Culbreath
2W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Amy Jacobs
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Durr
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Camille Rhoads
6W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Tracie Simmons
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
2.5
April Lee
3W–11L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Stephanie Stults
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Emily Colvin
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.