Teams

Holt-Day/18/2.5/CWN/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 2.5 Shrev

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Slusher/18/2.5/CWN/POTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Cope / Lori Lewis vs Meghan Slusher / Katherine Roberts0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Beth Yokem / Sara Holt vs Beth Geneux / Kelly Schmidt3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesOlivia Goldman / Aimee Ross vs Katherine Adams / Janelle M Leonard6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-19vs Wood-Luttkus/18/2.5/CWN/BTCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKirsten Day / Sarah Beth Yokem vs Heather Lollar / Kelli Shaw6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Cope / Sara Holt vs Chandni Chatrath / Sarah Pitfield6-0, 6-0
2026-08-12vs Rhoads/18/2.5/CWN/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Goins / Olivia Goldman vs Camille Rhoads / Michelle Nelson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Wheeler / Sundi Littleton vs Amy Jacobs / Ashley Durr6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKirsten Day / Brandi Sharkey vs Blair Culbreath / Emily Colvin6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Sarah Beth Yokem
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.51
Olivia Goldman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Allison Goins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.38
Sara Holt
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.35
Sundi Littleton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Aimee Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.32
Laura Cope
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.25
Kirsten Day
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Brandi Sharkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Angela Pharr
published 2.5
2.19
Hannah Matheny
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Braniff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Goins + Olivia Goldman3357% games−8.3% vs expected
Sundi Littleton + Aimee Ross224 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Beth Yokem + Kirsten Day044 matchesnot enough data
Aimee Ross + Kirsten Day213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Beth Yokem
14W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.62
Olivia Goldman
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
2.5
Allison Goins
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Sara Holt
13W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Sundi Littleton
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Aimee Ross
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Laura Cope
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Kirsten Day
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Brandi Sharkey
2W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Angela Pharr
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Hannah Matheny
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Jill Braniff
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.