Teams

Slusher/18/2.5/CWN/POTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 2.5 Shrev

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Holt-Day/18/2.5/CWN/BTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeghan Slusher / Katherine Roberts vs Laura Cope / Lori Lewis6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Geneux / Kelly Schmidt vs Sarah Beth Yokem / Sara Holt6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Adams / Janelle M Leonard vs Olivia Goldman / Aimee Ross4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-19vs Peck-McCain/18/2.5/CWN/QTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeth Geneux / Megan Pearce vs Shannon Peck / Erica McCain6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKatherine Adams / Leslie Hill vs Sarah Wilson / Ashley Lafitte6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKatherine Roberts / Claudia Kemper vs Antonisha Parish / Chenelle Pillette6-1, 6-0
2026-08-12vs Dupree/18/2.5/CWN/BTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmelia Craft / Kelly Schmidt vs Tanika Nash / Melanie Auchard0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCalli Lorant / Katherine Adams vs Bridget Dupree / Haley Poole7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMeghan Slusher / Katherine Roberts vs Michelle Darby / Michelle Josting6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Meghan Slusher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Leslie Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Janelle M Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.41
Megan Pearce
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Katherine Adams
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.31
Beth Geneux
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Claudia Kemper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Kelly Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Amelia Craft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Calli Lorant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Stephanie Pringle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amelia Craft + Katherine Adams213 matchesnot enough data
Amelia Craft + Kelly Schmidt033 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Adams + Janelle M Leonard303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meghan Slusher
34W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%22%78%
2.61
Leslie Hill
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%25%75%
2.60
Janelle M Leonard
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Megan Pearce
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Katherine Adams
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Beth Geneux
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Claudia Kemper
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Schmidt
2W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Amelia Craft
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Calli Lorant
8W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Stephanie Pringle
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.