← Teams

RBW-Sassy Super Seniors-Dodd

2022 Adult 70 & Over · Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-11vs BETC-HughesLost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKathleen Bremner / Heidi Broecking vs GAIL JENKINS / Mary Louise Sumioka3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Dodd / Sandy Rudolph vs Mary Jo Leonardson / Sally Linebarger3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLucille Barnard / Linda Mate vs Della McCleary / Jill Wakefield6-3, 6-4
2022-07-29vs FC-DanielsWon 2–1
L#1 DoublesKathleen Bremner / Heidi Broecking vs Ellen Johnson / Francisca Lehr2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJudy Rogers / Sandy Rudolph vs Lee Darrow / Corliss Liekkio6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLucille Barnard / Linda Mate vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-18vs HBSQ-SmalleyWon 2–1
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Martin / Carol Wolf vs Liz Smalley / Joyce Tierney6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Dodd / Sandy Rudolph vs JR Thompson / Pamela Elliott3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesClaudette Krause / Judy Rogers vs Pamela Steele / Michele Karantsavelos7-5, 6-3
2022-07-15vs BC-RiceWon 2–1
L#1 DoublesJudy Rogers / Carol Wolf vs Susan Walker / Beth Smith3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Martin / Linda Mate vs Bonnie Currey / Karen Dunlop7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Dodd / Sandy Rudolph vs Anne Bratton / Paula Wells6-2, 6-2
2022-07-08vs STC-Alwood/FeltonWon 3–0
W#1 DoublesHeidi Broecking / Carolyn Martin vs Karen Felton / Debbie Wilson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Mate / Judy Rogers vs Suzy Keeler / Gail Ransom6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLucille Barnard / Carol Wolf vs Barbara Kirk / Shari Treadwell7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Claudette Krause
published 3.5
3.16
Sandy Rudolph
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Heidi Broecking
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Judy Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Lucille Barnard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Linda Mate
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Suzanne Dodd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Carolyn Martin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Kathleen Bremner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Dodd + Sandy Rudolph8–1647% games−2.7% vs expected
Heidi Broecking + Kathleen Bremner1–638% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Martin + Lucille Barnard2–447% gamesnot enough data
Linda Mate + Judy Rogers3–348% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Broecking + Lucille Barnard2–345% gamesnot enough data
Lucille Barnard + Judy Rogers2–352% gamesnot enough data
Judy Rogers + Sandy Rudolph3–14 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Martin + Heidi Broecking1–23 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claudette Krause
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Sandy Rudolph
31W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Heidi Broecking
26W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Judy Rogers
36W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Lucille Barnard
18W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Linda Mate
15W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Suzanne Dodd
18W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Carolyn Martin
15W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
—
Kathleen Bremner
8W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.