Teams

BAY TREES PK 40AW3.5A-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-04vs DIABLO CC 40AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#1 DoublesDivya Bala / Julie Lowe vs Kate Doerksen / Rochelle Rich4-6, 2-6
2025-02-18vs PLEASANTON 40AW3.5B-DTLost 02
L#1 DoublesMinh Cannon / Divya Bala vs Wendy Greer / Sandra Harris2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGrace Fan / Audrey Schroeder vs Julieta Leong / Swina Sapkota2-6, 2-6
2025-01-24vs PLEASANTON 40AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#2 DoublesMinh Cannon / Julie Lowe vs Nadine Chiu / Laura Herbert7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-07vs CROW CANYON CC 40AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#2 DoublesGrace Fan / Julie Lowe vs Relura Horton / Dana Kruger2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Robyn Schleifman
published 3.5
3.45
Jazelle Nono
published
3.41
Toni Li
published
3.38
Minh Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Ella Hurd
published
3.20
Tinara Choing
published
3.13
Samantha Ng
published
3.07
Julie Lowe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Divya Bala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Lia Tjandra
published
2.93
Audrey Schroeder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Grace Fan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Shiow-Rong Lin
published
Nik Pham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Lowe + Shiow-Rong Lin123 matchesnot enough data
Robyn Schleifman + Jazelle Nono213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robyn Schleifman
110W–77L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Jazelle Nono
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Toni Li
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Minh Cannon
61W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Ella Hurd
47W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Tinara Choing
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Samantha Ng
30W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Julie Lowe
118W–102L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Divya Bala
8W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Lia Tjandra
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Audrey Schroeder
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Grace Fan
2W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.79
Shiow-Rong Lin
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%7%93%
2.71
Nik Pham
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.