Teams

DEAN 8.0 Mixed 40+ Mon

2023 Piedmont Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40+ Mon PM

13 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-17vs BROWN KL 8.0 Mixed 40+ MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Eberhard / Kevin Hawkins vs Ric Parker / Sallye Parker4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesCharley Eberhard / Diane Majestic vs Scott Lambeth / Jean Eagan6-1, 6-3
2023-07-03vs Davis 8.0 Mixed 40+ MonLost 01
L#3 DoublesDiane Majestic / Charley Eberhard vs Kara Ray / Jeremy Madrazo4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-26vs Robb 8.0 Mixed 40+ MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarrie Ganim / Kevin Hawkins vs Lauren Nutt / Brian Smith6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40+ Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Scott Dean
published
4.19
Lee Picklesimer
published
4.19
Beth Harris
published 4.5
4.07
Beth Mayer
published 4.5
3.98
Charley Eberhard
published 4
3.97
Carrie Ganim
published 4
3.94
Kevin Hawkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
D J McGarrigan
published 4
3.70
Diane Majestic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Tony McGraw
published
3.62
Kimberly Eberhard
published
3.29
Grayson Blow
published 3.5
3.14
Mary Dean
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tony McGraw + Carrie Ganim2345% games+1.2% vs expected
Charley Eberhard + Kimberly Eberhard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Dean
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.81
Lee Picklesimer
20W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Beth Harris
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Beth Mayer
16W–5L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
4.07
4
Charley Eberhard
11W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Carrie Ganim
25W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Kevin Hawkins
119W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
D J McGarrigan
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Diane Majestic
204W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Tony McGraw
25W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.69
Kimberly Eberhard
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Grayson Blow
25W–31L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Mary Dean
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.