Teams

Aces & Aches

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0M

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-24vs Sports Mall-McBroomWon 10
W#2 DoublesRon Burnside / Karl Tobler vs Don McBroom / Brent Butcher7-5, 6-0
2026-08-17vs Silver Slicers IIWon 30
W#1 DoublesRon Burnside / Karl Tobler vs Alfred Balch / Robert Janzen6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesThad Smith / Shawn Turner vs David Leta / Glenn Bailey6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRic Reed / Scott Hansen vs Mark Stonehocker / Raymond Verheydt6-1, 6-0
2026-08-14vs Sports Mall-McBroomWon 21
W#1 DoublesTony Mokhtarian / Steele Larson vs David Noyce / Brian Smith6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMark Miller / Garth Neilsen vs Craig Burkinshaw / Rod Zimbelman4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRon Burnside / Karl Tobler vs Niel Stout / Brent Butcher6-2, 6-1
2026-08-06vs Silver Slicers IIWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Rozsa / Steele Larson vs Alfred Balch / Mark Stonehocker6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShawn Turner / Ric Reed vs J David Nelson / Robert Janzen6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Aces & Aches2051227
2Sports Mall-McBroom0112433
3Silver Slicers II0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Tony Mokhtarian
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
David Rozsa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Thad Smith
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Ric Reed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Garth Neilsen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
David Wolfgramm
published 3
Karl Tobler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Pratt
published
Ron Burnside
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Scott Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shawn Turner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steele Larson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ron Burnside + Paul Pratt10755% games+6.0% vs expected
David Rozsa + Thad Smith4258% games+2.8% vs expected
Tony Mokhtarian + Scott Hansen6169% gamesnot enough data
Tony Mokhtarian + Ron Burnside5161% gamesnot enough data
Garth Neilsen + Ric Reed6073% gamesnot enough data
Mark Miller + Garth Neilsen3257% gamesnot enough data
Shawn Turner + Ric Reed303 matchesnot enough data
Tony Mokhtarian + Paul Pratt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tony Mokhtarian
79W–35L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
3.5
David Rozsa
179W–154L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Thad Smith
114W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Ric Reed
36W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Garth Neilsen
29W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
David Wolfgramm
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karl Tobler
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Miller
29W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Paul Pratt
21W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ron Burnside
50W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Hansen
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shawn Turner
25W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steele Larson
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.