Teams

TOC.Terjesen

2023 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-08-03vs CAS.KuzmaLost 01
L#1 SinglesKeely Williams vs Jennifer Kuzma2-6, 2-6
2023-06-15vs APEX.CohenLost 01
L#2 SinglesKeely Williams vs Jennifer Hellrung4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Emily Yang
published 3.5
3.23
Kathleen Murray
published
3.19
Paula Dwyer
published
2.89
Keely Williams
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.84
Lisa Mason
published
2.75
Betsy Terjesen
published 3
2.57
Susan Starnes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keely Williams + Betsy Terjesen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Yang
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.31
Kathleen Murray
16W–18L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Paula Dwyer
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Keely Williams
186W–157L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lisa Mason
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Betsy Terjesen
145W–85L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Susan Starnes
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.