Teams

CAS.Kuzma

2023 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-17vs TOC.MurphyWon 20
W#1 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Cyndy Fettig6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDenise Decandia vs SIUHING LAI6-2, 6-0
2023-08-10vs PW.HallWon 10
W#1 SinglesStayce Key vs Jodi Case7-5, 6-3
2023-08-03vs TOC.TerjesenWon 10
W#2 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Kathleen Murray7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-07-27vs APEX.CohenWon 20
W#1 SinglesDenise Decandia vs Christine Qubeck6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Mary Wilson6-0, 6-1
2023-07-20vs MD.FlowerSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDenise Decandia vs Brigette Flower2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJoanne Kearney vs Angie Bostrom6-3, 7-5
2023-07-14vs TOC.LeahyWon 20
W#1 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Jennifer Leahy6-1, 7-5
W#3 SinglesJoanne Kearney vs Lisa Goodman5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-13vs LOCH.TobinWon 20
W#1 SinglesStayce Key vs Jessica Sahoo6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJoanne Kearney vs Beth Porter6-0, 6-1
2023-06-15vs MD.NewtonWon 20
W#1 SinglesDenise Decandia vs Katie Klingemann6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesStayce Key vs Katie Scroggins6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jennifer Kuzma
published
3.40
Denise Decandia
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Cari DeCandia
published 3.5
3.33
Karen Johnston
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Joanne Kearney
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Stayce Key
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Kearney + Karen Johnston5552% games+7.8% vs expected
Denise Decandia + Cari DeCandia3550% games+1.3% vs expected
Stayce Key + Joanne Kearney7163% gamesnot enough data
Joanne Kearney + Jennifer Kuzma134 matchesnot enough data
Joanne Kearney + Denise Decandia134 matchesnot enough data
Karen Johnston + Denise Decandia314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kuzma
51W–68L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Denise Decandia
121W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Cari DeCandia
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Karen Johnston
259W–106L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Joanne Kearney
269W–160L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Stayce Key
159W–140L career · 3 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.