Teams

PW.Hall

2023 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-17vs LOCH.TobinWon 20
W#2 SinglesJennifer Hogge vs Jennifer Dulin6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAndrea Dusina vs Megan Word6-0, 6-1
2023-08-10vs CAS.KuzmaLost 02
L#1 SinglesJodi Case vs Stayce Key5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCassie Hannan vs Cari DeCandia1-6, 0-6
2023-08-03vs TOC.LeahyLost 12
L#1 SinglesSiobhan Frieary vs Heather Ingram2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJodi Case vs Caroline Irish7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesCassie Hannan vs Jennifer Leahy1-6, 1-6
2023-07-20vs TOC.MurphyWon 20
W#1 SinglesSiobhan Frieary vs SIUHING LAI6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJennifer Hogge vs Jojo Chen6-0, 7-6
2023-07-05vs MD.FlowerLost 01
L#1 SinglesSiobhan Frieary vs Brigette Flower2-6, 4-6
2023-06-29vs TOC.TerjesenSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJennifer Hogge vs Kathleen Murray6-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJodi Case vs Susan Starnes6-4, 6-3
2023-06-22vs APEX.CohenLost 02
L#2 SinglesAndrea Dusina vs Mary Wilson7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesCassie Hannan vs Dana Frazier5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Jennifer Hogge
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Siobhan Frieary
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Andrea Dusina
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Jenn Cooper
published
3.03
Kimberly Hall
published
3.01
Jodi Case
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.84
Melissa Penabad
published
2.71
Cassie Hannan
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Dusina + Jennifer Hogge6172% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Case + Jennifer Hogge224 matchesnot enough data
Jenn Cooper + Kimberly Hall033 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Hall + Jennifer Hogge213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Hogge
82W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Siobhan Frieary
151W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Andrea Dusina
72W–68L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Jenn Cooper
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Kimberly Hall
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Jodi Case
89W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.01
Melissa Penabad
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Cassie Hannan
32W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.