Teams

CACM BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

22 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2024-05-31vs DTC PURPLELost 12
W#1 DoublesIzabela Rydel / Janice Kercheville vs Sheri Jacobs / Cherlyn Linden6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLeigh Kingman vs Kari Cao3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBritt Nielsen / Elizabeth Anderman vs Trisha Cohen / Kimberly Nanke2-6, 4-6
2024-05-31vs CP REDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJanice Kercheville / Julie McClung vs Cyndie Miller / AMY SITZE7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaley Rickert / Elizabeth Anderman vs Dianne Johnson-Pape / Chelsea Taylor6-4, 6-0
2024-05-27vs SKY BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesLeigh Stafford / Sarah Stavros vs Catherine Hodges / Julie Wright2-6, 3-6
2024-05-13vs CM ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzann Gobis / Kaley Rickert vs Kathy Ammann / Angela Dellasalle6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLeigh Kingman vs Jennifer Cook7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie McClung / Janice Kercheville vs Mary Fitzpatrick / Aileen Worden4-6, 2-6
2024-05-13vs CM TEALLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarly Schwab / Susan Sundeen vs Alison Thompson / Jennifer Malen3-6, 4-6
2024-05-06vs WP-O REDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStephanie Bolsei / Sarah Stavros vs Kate Harvey / Kelly Harvey2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarly Schwab / Amy Mcilwain vs Lexie Haggerty / Anne Burke Baldridge6-2, 6-2
2024-05-06vs GPTC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesIzabela Rydel / Kaley Rickert vs Renee Morris / Julie Pellet6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLeigh Kingman / Suzann Gobis vs Kristin Baird / Karin French4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Anderman vs Heather Colliander6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanice Kercheville / Lisa Allen vs Molly Holland / Amy Parent6-3, 7-5
2024-04-29vs WP-L PINKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Mcilwain / Sarah Stavros vs Kala Koehn / Claire Jimenez7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCarly Schwab / Stephanie Bolsei vs Bethany Benish / Ava Renbarge2-6, 1-6
2024-04-29vs WP-G NAVYWon 21
W#2 DoublesJanice Kercheville / Julie McClung vs Phyllis Suarez / Samantha Spiwak6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLeigh Kingman vs Kelly Kurtz6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Allen / Elizabeth Anderman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-22vs DTC BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesStephanie Bolsei / Sarah Stavros vs Stephanie Martins / Kwai Kendall Grove1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarly Schwab / Leigh Stafford vs Evelyn Price / Brenda Byrne3-6, 1-6
2024-04-22vs GTC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesIzabela Rydel / Kaley Rickert vs Sabine Hoover / Rachel Brand6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLeigh Kingman / Suzann Gobis vs Susan Bruce / Susan Kim6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Mueting / Julie McClung vs Dianna Benavidez / Jillian Roholt7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-15vs DTP NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Stavros / Skylene Montgomery vs Erica Roybal / Jennifer Grumann3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarly Schwab / Susan Sundeen vs Jill Wichlens / Andrea Horan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-15vs GTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Anderman / Katherine Cuevas vs Tara Kill / Julie Woodle1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Kingman / Suzann Gobis vs Brenda Emerson / Ellen Lee2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKaley Rickert vs AnnMarie Morrison6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJulie McClung / Angela Mueting vs Leah Johnson / Kaye Wonder3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Rena Lim Scofield
published
3.17
Katherine Savoy
published
3.12
Katherine Cuevas
published
2.92
Amy Mcilwain
published 3
2.88
Camille Ford
published 3
2.87
Janice Kercheville
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.85
Skylene Montgomery
published
2.84
Kaley Rickert
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.75
Julie McClung
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.73
Eleanor Morse
published 3
2.67
Leigh Kingman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.66
Izabela Rydel
published
2.66
Maya Pingle Trinen
published
2.65
Sarah Stavros
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.54
Elizabeth Anderman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.40
Susan Sundeen
published
2.36
Carly Schwab
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.32
Britt Nielsen
published 2.5
Angela Mueting
published 2.5
Leigh Stafford
published
Stephanie Bolsei
published
Suzann Gobis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Ford + Leigh Stafford3355% games+7.9% vs expected
Sarah Stavros + Leigh Stafford3451% games+7.2% vs expected
Leigh Kingman + Kaley Rickert9455% games+5.4% vs expected
Sarah Stavros + Carly Schwab3644% games+2.5% vs expected
Leigh Kingman + Julie McClung141052% games+1.3% vs expected
Stephanie Bolsei + Carly Schwab1433% games−4.7% vs expected
Susan Sundeen + Carly Schwab044 matchesnot enough data
Suzann Gobis + Izabela Rydel134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rena Lim Scofield
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.31
Katherine Savoy
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Katherine Cuevas
38W–29L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Amy Mcilwain
18W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Camille Ford
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Janice Kercheville
63W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
Skylene Montgomery
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Kaley Rickert
43W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Julie McClung
53W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Eleanor Morse
29W–26L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Leigh Kingman
84W–81L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Izabela Rydel
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
Maya Pingle Trinen
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Sarah Stavros
25W–61L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Elizabeth Anderman
34W–55L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
Susan Sundeen
6W–24L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.40
2.5
Carly Schwab
22W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Britt Nielsen
9W–19L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Angela Mueting
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leigh Stafford
15W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Bolsei
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzann Gobis
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.