Teams

DO 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Edwards)

2025 Dothan USTA Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level Women 3.5, 3.0, 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-28vs WTC - Crowley 18 TriLevelWon 30
W#1 DoublesHelen Mendheim / Caitlin Perry vs Carlene Sessions / Callie Ventress6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAllison Edwards / Carol Hundley vs Bernadette Haskins / Payton Ball6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAllison Necessary / Katie Lewis vs Anna Lewis / Caroline Dozier6-4, 7-5
2025-05-21vs WTC - Crowley 18 TriLevelWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Hundley / Jenny Nelson vs Julia Johnson / Carie Crowley6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAllison Edwards / Jamie Peacock vs Chelsea Petrey / Payton Ball2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKylie Harris / Ashley Barron vs Erin Johnson / Brook Robertson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-14vs WTC - Crowley 18 TriLevelWon 21
W#1 DoublesHelen Mendheim / Carol Hundley vs Julia Johnson / Carlene Sessions4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllison Edwards / Jenny Nelson vs Chelsea Petrey / Payton Ball1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKatie Lewis / Allison Necessary vs Erin Johnson / Caroline Dozier7-6, 7-6
2025-05-07vs WTC - Crowley 18 TriLevelWon 21
W#1 DoublesJenny Nelson / Allison Edwards vs Julia Johnson / Carlene Sessions6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJamie Peacock / Kylie Harris vs Margaret Poston / Chelsea Petrey0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Barron / Katie Lewis vs Erin Johnson / Caroline Dozier6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Women 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Caitlin Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Helen Mendheim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Carol Hundley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Allison Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Katie Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Kylie Harris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Jenny Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Jamie Peacock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Ashley Barron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.49
Allison Necessary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Edwards + Jenny Nelson2354% gamesnot enough data
Jenny Nelson + Carol Hundley3254% gamesnot enough data
Caitlin Perry + Allison Edwards123 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Barron + Katie Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caitlin Perry
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Helen Mendheim
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Carol Hundley
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Allison Edwards
14W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Katie Lewis
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Kylie Harris
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Jenny Nelson
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Jamie Peacock
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
2.5
Ashley Barron
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.55
2.5
Allison Necessary
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.