Teams

WTC - Crowley 18 TriLevel

2025 Dothan USTA Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level Women 3.5, 3.0, 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-28vs DO 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Edwards)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarlene Sessions / Callie Ventress vs Helen Mendheim / Caitlin Perry2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBernadette Haskins / Payton Ball vs Allison Edwards / Carol Hundley3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnna Lewis / Caroline Dozier vs Allison Necessary / Katie Lewis4-6, 5-7
2025-05-21vs DO 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Edwards)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJulia Johnson / Carie Crowley vs Carol Hundley / Jenny Nelson3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChelsea Petrey / Payton Ball vs Allison Edwards / Jamie Peacock6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesErin Johnson / Brook Robertson vs Kylie Harris / Ashley Barron7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-14vs DO 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Edwards)Split 11
L#1 DoublesJulia Johnson / Carlene Sessions vs Helen Mendheim / Carol Hundley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChelsea Petrey / Payton Ball vs Allison Edwards / Jenny Nelson6-1, 7-5
2025-05-07vs DO 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Edwards)Split 11
L#1 DoublesJulia Johnson / Carlene Sessions vs Jenny Nelson / Allison Edwards0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMargaret Poston / Chelsea Petrey vs Jamie Peacock / Kylie Harris6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Women 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Carie Crowley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Callie Ventress
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Carlene Sessions
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Margaret Poston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Chelsea Petrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Payton Ball
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Bernadette Haskins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Anna Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Brook Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Michelle Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Poston + Payton Ball6353% games+7.7% vs expected
Margaret Poston + Chelsea Petrey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carie Crowley
19W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Callie Ventress
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Carlene Sessions
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
Margaret Poston
19W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Chelsea Petrey
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
Payton Ball
13W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
2.5
Bernadette Haskins
3W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
Anna Lewis
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Brook Robertson
0W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Jones
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.