Teams

OG Dream

2025 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-20vs Aces & LacesWon 20
W#1 DoublesSue Markuson / Laura Fletcher vs Hitomi Saheki / Kit Herndon5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRose Radke / Elizabeth Davis vs Sue Large / Phyllis Cox6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-13vs Aces & LacesLost 01
L#3 DoublesSue Markuson / Sheri Wippel vs Sue Large / Hitomi Saheki3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-11vs Aces & LacesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTheresa Janecek / Elizabeth Davis vs Monica Opp / Kathy Tassano1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSue Markuson / Sheri Wippel vs Phyllis Cox / Hitomi Saheki6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-08-06vs Aces & LacesWon 10
W#3 DoublesSue Markuson / Theresa Janecek vs Sharon Clark / Kathy Tassano3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-04vs Aces & LacesLost 02
L#1 DoublesTheresa Janecek / Sue Markuson vs Kathy Miller / Soeurette Chambreau7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Fletcher / Elizabeth Davis vs Kendra Hines / Suzanne Thomas0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OG Dream4210822171
2Aces & Laces2481024150

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Laura Fletcher
published 3
2.72
Rose Radke
published 3
2.70
Sheri Wippel
published 3
2.67
Teresa Thonney
published 3
2.53
Theresa Janecek
published 3
2.33
Janna Tipton
published 3
Elizabeth Davis
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sue Markuson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheri Wippel + Laura Fletcher10949% games−5.3% vs expected
Sue Markuson + Rose Radke01331% gamesnot enough data
Sue Markuson + Laura Fletcher6651% gamesnot enough data
Sue Markuson + Sheri Wippel6454% gamesnot enough data
Sue Markuson + Theresa Janecek4251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Laura Fletcher
79W–71L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Rose Radke
62W–108L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Sheri Wippel
112W–119L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Teresa Thonney
19W–24L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Theresa Janecek
16W–27L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Janna Tipton
48W–81L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.33
Elizabeth Davis
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sue Markuson
54W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.