Teams

Young 18s

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 18 & OVER · Women 8.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-09-02vs Egger/NelsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Gustavson / Laurie Sullivan vs Karen McCarty / Anne Egger6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSonya Young / Anna Porcelli vs Jeanne-Marie Stevens / Janet Waren7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNatalie Collins / Heather Senter vs Darby McCall / Lee Ann Zierenberg1-6, 2-6
2026-08-24vs Claus Combo8.5(18+)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Swain / Carolyn Gustavson vs Brooke Cranor / Lara Hanks6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Isenhour / Brittany Savoca vs Whitney Harrison / Cari Hopson6-1, 7-5
2026-08-19vs Hickman 8.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesTracie McCabe / Cassie Causey vs Jennifer Van Ness / Helen Mathias-Hinson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeather Senter / Kendrick Gaddy vs Jenna Crawford / Madison Seidel3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Gustavson / Laurie Sullivan vs Taylor Waddle / Lindsay Parker6-2, 6-3
2026-08-15vs Egger/NelsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesKatie Swain / Anna Porcelli vs Janet Waren / Elizabeth Eakin6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesFrances Coleman / Meredith Cramer vs Rachel Bonfiglio / Ashley DeGroote3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTracie McCabe / Jenna Stachowiak vs Karen McCarty / Lee Ann Zierenberg7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Egger/Nelson1021329
2Young 18s1142551
3Hickman 8.51133650
4Claus Combo8.5(18+)000000
5Atterbury 8.50103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Carolyn Gustavson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Cassie Causey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Katie Swain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Anna Porcelli
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
4.03
Meredith Cramer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Sonya Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Tracie McCabe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Frances Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Jenna Stachowiak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Laurie Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Brittany Savoca
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Heather Senter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kendrick Gaddy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Isenhour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracie McCabe + Laurie Sullivan3545% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carolyn Gustavson
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Cassie Causey
7W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
21%78%<1%
4.11
Katie Swain
31W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
4
Anna Porcelli
27W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.09
Meredith Cramer
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
Sonya Young
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Tracie McCabe
278W–98L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.91
Frances Coleman
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Jenna Stachowiak
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Laurie Sullivan
15W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
3.5
Brittany Savoca
24W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Heather Senter
243W–166L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kendrick Gaddy
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Isenhour
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.