Teams

Claus Combo8.5(18+)

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 18 & OVER · Women 8.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs Young 18sLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrooke Cranor / Lara Hanks vs Katie Swain / Carolyn Gustavson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWhitney Harrison / Cari Hopson vs Lauren Isenhour / Brittany Savoca1-6, 5-7
2026-08-19vs Egger/NelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesWhitney Harrison / Cari Hopson vs Darby McCall / Anna Taylor6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Claus / Ursula Ramsey vs Barbara Caropolo / Kristin Main4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Huber / Ashley Hawkins vs Jeanne-Marie Stevens / Janet Waren4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Egger/Nelson1021329
2Young 18s1142551
3Hickman 8.51133650
4Claus Combo8.5(18+)000000
5Atterbury 8.50103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Brooke Cranor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Cari Hopson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.96
Allison Huber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Ursula Ramsey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Elizabeth Claus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Wesley Barker
published
3.85
Jackie Cruse
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Kathryn Weeks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Ashley Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Whitney Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Debra Jones
published 4
3.55
Lara Hanks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Sue Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lara Hanks + Elizabeth Claus4460% games+4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Cranor
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Cari Hopson
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.12
4.5
Allison Huber
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.96
Ursula Ramsey
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94
Elizabeth Claus
35W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Wesley Barker
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.88
Jackie Cruse
37W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
Kathryn Weeks
21W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Ashley Hawkins
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.70
Whitney Harrison
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Debra Jones
24W–18L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Lara Hanks
14W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sue Fuller
25W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.