Teams

GR-Dawson 40s 3.0W S

2025 Neuse River Singles 40 & over · 3.0 Women 40 & over

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-11vs GCC-Dempsey 40s 3.0W SLost 12
L#1 SinglesMegan Pender vs Nicole Carlyle5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJennie Baggett vs Keela Blango2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesRebecca Helms vs Jenny Dempsey6-3, 7-6
2025-02-26vs GCC-Dempsey 40s 3.0W SLost 02
L#1 SinglesMegan Pender vs Mary-Marshall Greene2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKelli Dawson vs Lakisha Dawson4-6, 1-6
2025-02-15vs GCC-Dempsey 40s 3.0W SLost 12
W#1 SinglesKristi Geer vs Hanan Elgendy1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCrystal Dawson vs Shumena Horton3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesGeneva Colie vs KENNEDY BLOUNT2-6, 0-6
2025-02-08vs GCC-Dempsey 40s 3.0W SLost 03
L#1 SinglesMegan Pender vs Nicole Carlyle5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRhonda Abbott vs Keela Blango1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRebecca Helms vs KENNEDY BLOUNT2-6, 4-6
2025-02-01vs GCC-Dempsey 40s 3.0W SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKristi Geer vs Shumena Horton6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRhonda Abbott vs Lakisha Dawson1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Jennie Baggett
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Kristi Geer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.63
Kelli Dawson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.58
Rhonda Abbott
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.47
Megan Pender
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.25
Crystal Dawson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Rebecca Helms
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.10
Geneva Colie
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal Dawson + Megan Pender5449% games+5.6% vs expected
Geneva Colie + Megan Pender134 matchesnot enough data
Jennie Baggett + Megan Pender314 matchesnot enough data
Geneva Colie + Kristi Geer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennie Baggett
17W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Kristi Geer
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Kelli Dawson
24W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
Rhonda Abbott
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%27%73%
2.58
Megan Pender
29W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%58%42%
2.47
2.5
Crystal Dawson
19W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Rebecca Helms
11W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Geneva Colie
16W–70L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.