Teams

GCC-Dempsey 40s 3.0W S

2025 Neuse River Singles 40 & over · 3.0 Women 40 & over

9 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-11vs GR-Dawson 40s 3.0W SWon 21
W#1 SinglesNicole Carlyle vs Megan Pender7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKeela Blango vs Jennie Baggett6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJenny Dempsey vs Rebecca Helms3-6, 6-7
2025-02-26vs GR-Dawson 40s 3.0W SWon 30
W#1 SinglesMary-Marshall Greene vs Megan Pender6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLakisha Dawson vs Kelli Dawson6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKeela Blango vs Cathy Williams6-1, 6-3
2025-02-15vs GR-Dawson 40s 3.0W SWon 21
L#1 SinglesHanan Elgendy vs Kristi Geer6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesShumena Horton vs Crystal Dawson6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKENNEDY BLOUNT vs Geneva Colie6-2, 6-0
2025-02-08vs GR-Dawson 40s 3.0W SWon 30
W#1 SinglesNicole Carlyle vs Megan Pender7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKeela Blango vs Rhonda Abbott6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKENNEDY BLOUNT vs Rebecca Helms6-2, 6-4
2025-02-01vs GR-Dawson 40s 3.0W SWon 21
L#1 SinglesShumena Horton vs Kristi Geer2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLakisha Dawson vs Rhonda Abbott6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKeela Blango vs Cathy Williams6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Lakisha Dawson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Juanita Yarrell
published
2.79
Mary-Marshall Greene
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.73
Keela Blango
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.67
Nicole Carlyle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.54
KENNEDY BLOUNT
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.53
Hanan Elgendy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.18
Jenny Dempsey
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Shumena Horton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Carlyle + Mary-Marshall Greene224 matchesnot enough data
Juanita Yarrell + Mary-Marshall Greene303 matchesnot enough data
Lakisha Dawson + Mary-Marshall Greene303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lakisha Dawson
52W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Juanita Yarrell
23W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
Mary-Marshall Greene
39W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
0%2%98%
2.79
Keela Blango
36W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Nicole Carlyle
31W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
KENNEDY BLOUNT
18W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
Hanan Elgendy
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53
Jenny Dempsey
10W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Shumena Horton
17W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.