Teams

Kortsha/Carlson

2022 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 WOMEN

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Kelsey Aden
published
3.94
Karen Feagler
published
3.88
Mary Jayne Crocker
published
3.83
Rachel Reese
published
Anna Zumwinkle
published 4
3.72
Lisa LaCombe
published
3.67
Kimberly Mueller
published
3.60
3.53
Barbara Brill
published 4
3.53
Elizabeth Olig
published 4
3.48
Gina Carlson
published 4
3.27
Joan Gustafson
published
Karen Zellner
published
Michelle Paule
published
Randa Schuster
published
Sarah Cornelius
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyssa Vanderschaaf + Rachel Reese6254% games−3.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Olig + Kimberly Mueller7450% games−11.0% vs expected
Gina Carlson + Mary Jayne Crocker224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsey Aden
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
Karen Feagler
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.94
Mary Jayne Crocker
8W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
Rachel Reese
57W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Anna Zumwinkle
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa LaCombe
21W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Kimberly Mueller
24W–24L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Alyssa Vanderschaaf
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Barbara Brill
9W–54L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Elizabeth Olig
16W–30L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Gina Carlson
19W–37L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Joan Gustafson
43W–68L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Karen Zellner
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Paule
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Randa Schuster
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Cornelius
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.